• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

蜜蜂对乙醇蒸气的敏感性及其与攻击性的相关性

Characterization of honey bee sensitivity to ethanol vapor and its correlation with aggression.

作者信息

Ammons Andrew D, Hunt Greg J

机构信息

School of Life Sciences, University of Nevada at Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA. ammons.unlv.nevada.edu

出版信息

Alcohol. 2008 Mar;42(2):129-36. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2007.12.005.

DOI:10.1016/j.alcohol.2007.12.005
PMID:18358992
Abstract

Several candidate genes identified from quantitative trait loci (QTL) for defensive behavior in honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) are homologous to genes known to influence ethanol sensitivity in other organisms. To investigate this possible link between aggression/defense and ethanol sensitivity, assays were developed to evaluate ethanol vapor responses in worker bees from a low-defensive (gentle) colony and a high-defensive colony. Defensive workers exhibited characteristic signs of ethanol-induced sedation significantly faster than gentle workers upon exposure to ethanol vapor. Backcross workers displayed ethanol sensitivity intermediate to the parental defensive and gentle lines, suggesting a genetic basis for the trait. Workers were screened with sequence-tagged site markers linked to three defensive-behavior QTL and their genotypes were tested for associations with ethanol sensitivity. There were no significant associations, indicating that the defensive QTL were not having a pleiotropic effect on ethanol sensitivity. It is possible that gentle-source alleles at these QTL are dominant with respect to sensitivity, one or more of these QTL were not segregating in the backcross family, or unidentified QTL are influencing alcohol sensitivity.

摘要

从蜜蜂(西方蜜蜂)防御行为的数量性状基因座(QTL)中鉴定出的几个候选基因与已知影响其他生物乙醇敏感性的基因同源。为了研究攻击/防御与乙醇敏感性之间的这种可能联系,开发了一些试验来评估来自低防御性(温顺)蜂群和高防御性蜂群的工蜂对乙醇蒸气的反应。与温顺的工蜂相比,防御性工蜂在接触乙醇蒸气后,出现乙醇诱导的镇静特征性迹象的速度明显更快。回交工蜂表现出的乙醇敏感性介于亲代防御性和温顺品系之间,这表明该性状具有遗传基础。用工蜂与与三个防御行为QTL连锁的序列标签位点标记进行筛选,并测试它们的基因型与乙醇敏感性的关联。没有显著关联,这表明防御性QTL对乙醇敏感性没有多效性影响。这些QTL处的温顺来源等位基因在敏感性方面可能是显性的,这些QTL中的一个或多个在回交家族中没有分离,或者未鉴定的QTL正在影响酒精敏感性。

相似文献

1
Characterization of honey bee sensitivity to ethanol vapor and its correlation with aggression.蜜蜂对乙醇蒸气的敏感性及其与攻击性的相关性
Alcohol. 2008 Mar;42(2):129-36. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2007.12.005.
2
Identification of Quantitative Trait Loci and candidate genes influencing ethanol sensitivity in honey bees.蜜蜂中影响乙醇敏感性的数量性状基因座及候选基因的鉴定。
Behav Genet. 2008 Sep;38(5):531-53. doi: 10.1007/s10519-008-9218-z. Epub 2008 Jul 26.
3
Pleiotropy, epistasis and new QTL: the genetic architecture of honey bee foraging behavior.多效性、上位性与新的数量性状基因座:蜜蜂觅食行为的遗传结构
J Hered. 2004 Nov-Dec;95(6):481-91. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esh072.
4
Characterization of quantitative trait loci for the age of first foraging in honey bee workers.蜜蜂工蜂首次觅食年龄的数量性状位点特征分析。
Behav Genet. 2009 Sep;39(5):541-53. doi: 10.1007/s10519-009-9278-8. Epub 2009 May 17.
5
The development of an ethanol model using social insects I: behavior studies of the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.).利用群居昆虫建立乙醇模型的研究 I:蜜蜂(西方蜜蜂)的行为研究
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2000 Aug;24(8):1153-66.
6
Genomic analysis in the sting-2 quantitative trait locus for defensive behavior in the honey bee, Apis mellifera.蜜蜂(西方蜜蜂)防御行为的sting - 2数量性状基因座的基因组分析。
Genome Res. 2003 Dec;13(12):2588-93. doi: 10.1101/gr.1634503.
7
A genetic analysis of the stinging and guarding behaviors of the honey bee.对蜜蜂蜇刺和守卫行为的遗传分析。
Behav Genet. 2012 Jul;42(4):663-74. doi: 10.1007/s10519-012-9530-5. Epub 2012 Feb 11.
8
Seven suggestive quantitative trait loci influence hygienic behavior of honey bees.七个具有提示性的数量性状基因座影响蜜蜂的卫生行为。
Naturwissenschaften. 2002 Dec;89(12):565-8. doi: 10.1007/s00114-002-0371-6. Epub 2002 Oct 26.
9
Support for the reproductive ground plan hypothesis of social evolution and major QTL for ovary traits of Africanized worker honey bees (Apis mellifera L.).支持社会进化的生殖基础假说和非洲化工蜂卵巢性状的主要 QTL。(Apis mellifera L.)
BMC Evol Biol. 2011 Apr 13;11:95. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-95.
10
Development of an ethanol model using social insects: IV. Influence of ethanol on the aggression of Africanized honey bees (Apis mellifera L.).利用群居昆虫建立乙醇模型:IV. 乙醇对非洲化蜜蜂(Apis mellifera L.)攻击性的影响。
Psychol Rep. 2004 Jun;94(3 Pt 2):1107-15. doi: 10.2466/pr0.94.3c.1107-1115.

引用本文的文献

1
Physiological and behavioral pharmacology of ethanol in honey bees.乙醇在蜜蜂中的生理与行为药理学
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s00359-025-01743-8.
2
Preliminary Analysis of Genetic Markers for Functional Ethanol Tolerance in Honey Bees () Using a Free-Flying Paradigm.利用自由飞行范式对蜜蜂功能性乙醇耐受性遗传标记的初步分析()
Insects. 2024 Jul 2;15(7):494. doi: 10.3390/insects15070494.
3
Occasional and constant exposure to dietary ethanol shortens the lifespan of worker honey bees.
偶尔和持续接触食物中的乙醇会缩短工蜂的寿命。
J Comp Physiol B. 2024 Aug;194(4):403-410. doi: 10.1007/s00360-024-01571-3. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
4
The Effects of Ethanol and Acetic acid on Behaviour of Extranidal Workers of the Narrow-Headed Ant (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) during a Field Experiment.乙醇和乙酸对窄头蚁(膜翅目,蚁科)野外实验期间巢外工蚁行为的影响
Animals (Basel). 2023 Aug 28;13(17):2734. doi: 10.3390/ani13172734.
5
Discontinued alcohol consumption elicits withdrawal symptoms in honeybees.停止饮酒会使蜜蜂出现戒断症状。
Biol Lett. 2021 Jun;17(6):20210182. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2021.0182. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
6
Honeybees show adaptive reactions to ethanol exposure.蜜蜂对乙醇暴露表现出适应性反应。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 7;8(1):8707. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27117-6.
7
Manipulation of colony environment modulates honey bee aggression and brain gene expression.操纵蜂群环境可调节蜜蜂的攻击性和大脑基因表达。
Genes Brain Behav. 2013 Nov;12(8):802-11. doi: 10.1111/gbb.12087. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
8
Cocaine tolerance in honey bees.蜜蜂体内的可卡因耐受现象。
PLoS One. 2013 May 31;8(5):e64920. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064920. Print 2013.