Robinson Jennifer G
Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 2008 Apr 1;101(7):1009-15. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.11.060.
Five models are proposed to describe the relations among statins, pleiotropic effects, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol lowering, and cardiovascular risk reduction. On the basis of the evidence available, the pleiotropic effects of statins do not appear to reduce cardiovascular risk more than would be predicted from LDL cholesterol lowering alone, which suggests that model 1 is not a valid model. Although most attention has focused on models 2 through 4, most data to date support model 3 for describing the relation between statins, inflammation, and cardiovascular risk. Stronger consideration should also be given to model 5, in which pleiotropic effects are the result of cardiovascular risk reduction in and of itself. It may be that other models are operative for nonatherosclerotic inflammatory disorders. However, beneficial effects of statins on rheumatologic or other noncardiovascular may still be due to effects of cholesterol reduction on the immune system, as in model 3. More high-quality research is needed to determine the role of statin pleiotropic effects in cardiovascular risk reduction. Well-designed animal studies can help elucidate potential mechanisms, which will then require confirmation in human studies with cardiovascular event outcomes. Substudies of cardiovascular end point trials and mechanistic studies should be methodologically sound and designed to test specific models. To sort out the independence of pleiotropic effects from LDL cholesterol lowering, studies will need to achieve similar LDL cholesterol reductions in each treatment group. It may be that the biologic impact of a specific pleiotropic effect is mediated by >1 model. Ultimately, once a predominant model has been identified for a given pleiotropic effect, long-term studies would be needed to evaluate the relative contributions of various pleiotropic effects to cardiovascular risk reduction. These findings may reveal new targets for the development of new agents that will prove effective for reducing cardiovascular events when added to LDL cholesterol lowering. To date, little evidence supports consideration of statin pleiotropic effects in clinical decision making. In conclusion, LDL cholesterol is currently the only reliable marker for statin effects on cardiovascular risk reduction. The focus should remain on closing the treatment gap and improving adherence to therapies directed at lowering LDL cholesterol and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease.
提出了五种模型来描述他汀类药物、多效性作用、降低低密度脂蛋白(LDL)胆固醇以及降低心血管风险之间的关系。根据现有证据,他汀类药物的多效性作用似乎并不比仅通过降低LDL胆固醇所预测的更能降低心血管风险,这表明模型1不是一个有效的模型。尽管大多数关注集中在模型2至4上,但迄今为止的大多数数据支持模型3用于描述他汀类药物、炎症和心血管风险之间的关系。还应更深入地考虑模型5,其中多效性作用本身就是降低心血管风险的结果。对于非动脉粥样硬化性炎症性疾病,可能存在其他起作用的模型。然而,他汀类药物对风湿性或其他非心血管疾病的有益作用可能仍归因于胆固醇降低对免疫系统的影响,如模型3中所述。需要更多高质量的研究来确定他汀类药物多效性作用在降低心血管风险中的作用。精心设计的动物研究有助于阐明潜在机制,随后需要在具有心血管事件结局的人体研究中进行证实。心血管终点试验的子研究和机制研究在方法上应合理,并设计用于测试特定模型。为了区分多效性作用与降低LDL胆固醇的独立性,研究需要在每个治疗组中实现相似的LDL胆固醇降低。特定多效性作用的生物学影响可能由多种模型介导。最终,一旦确定了给定多效性作用的主要模型,就需要进行长期研究来评估各种多效性作用对降低心血管风险的相对贡献。这些发现可能揭示开发新药物的新靶点,当与降低LDL胆固醇的药物联合使用时,这些新药物将被证明对减少心血管事件有效。迄今为止,几乎没有证据支持在临床决策中考虑他汀类药物的多效性作用。总之,LDL胆固醇目前是他汀类药物降低心血管风险作用的唯一可靠标志物。重点应仍然是缩小治疗差距,并提高对旨在降低LDL胆固醇和非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇的治疗的依从性,以减轻心血管疾病负担。