Kaidar-Person Orit, Rosenthal Raul J, Wexner Steven D, Szomstein Samuel, Person Benjamin
Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA.
Am J Surg. 2008 Jun;195(6):818-26. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.10.006.
Despite the fact that the concept of compression anastomosis has been investigated for nearly 2 centuries, it has not yet achieved widespread acceptance. The aim of the current report is to review the literature regarding compression anastomoses.
A multi-database search was conducted using PubMed, Ovid, and the Cochrane Databases (all until June 2007), in addition to electronic links to related articles and references of selected articles. The following terms were used for the search in various combinations: anastomosis, anastomoses, sutureless, compression, nickel-titanium; Nitinol; CAC; CAR; AKA-2, Valtrac biofragmentable anastomotic ring, BAR. Language restrictions were not applied.
The various methods of compression anastomosis have been shown to be at least comparable to the standard techniques of suturing and stapling. The measurement of outcomes, including cost, safety, and efficacy of treatment, indicated that compression anastomosis can save time, is cost-effective, and offers an acceptable cost/benefit ratio compared to both stapled and sutured anastomoses. However, compression anastomosis did not gain worldwide popularity.
尽管吻合器吻合的概念已被研究了近两个世纪,但它尚未得到广泛认可。本报告的目的是回顾有关吻合器吻合的文献。
除了通过电子链接获取相关文章及所选文章的参考文献外,还使用PubMed、Ovid和Cochrane数据库(截至2007年6月)进行了多数据库搜索。在搜索中使用了以下术语的各种组合:吻合、吻合术、无缝合、吻合器、镍钛合金;镍钛诺;CAC;CAR;AKA - 2、可生物降解的Valtrac吻合环、BAR。未设置语言限制。
各种吻合器吻合方法已被证明至少与标准的缝合和钉合技术相当。对包括治疗成本、安全性和疗效在内的结果进行衡量表明,吻合器吻合可节省时间,具有成本效益,与钉合和缝合吻合相比,其成本效益比也可接受。然而,吻合器吻合并未在全球范围内广泛应用。