Kueper Markus A, Kramer Klaus M, Kirschniak Andreas, Königsrainer Alfred, Pointner Rudolph, Granderath Frank A
Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
World J Surg. 2008 Jul;32(7):1462-5. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9548-2.
The aim of this study was to define a standardized technique for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in the morbidly obese patient.
There are several surgical options for the morbidy obese patient. In general, there are the restrictive procedures [e.g., laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB)] and the malabsorptive procedures [e.g. laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP)]. Those techniques are already standardized. The laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) seems to have some advantages over both procedures, but it is not standardized yet, and so there can be no comparison between the different techniques. In our center we have standardized the LSG technique with respect to abdominal access and narrowness of the gastric sleeve. After dissection of the greater omentum and the short gastric vessels, the greater curvature is resected along a 34-Fr gastric tube using the Endo-GIA. The remaining gastric sleeve has a volume of about 100 ml.
The standardized LSG procedure is presented step by step. A comparison of operative data and early outcome with a matched group of patients with adjustable gastric banding showed no difference between the two techniques with respect to operating time, surgical complications, and weight loss 6 months after surgery.
With our standardized LSG technique it is possible to evaluate the positive aspects of the LSG compared with other standardized bariatric procedures like LAGB or LRYGBP.
本研究的目的是为病态肥胖患者定义一种标准化的腹腔镜袖状胃切除术技术。
对于病态肥胖患者有多种手术选择。一般来说,有限制性手术[如腹腔镜可调节胃束带术(LAGB)]和吸收不良性手术[如腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(LRYGBP)]。这些技术已经标准化。腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)似乎比这两种手术都有一些优势,但它尚未标准化,因此不同技术之间无法进行比较。在我们中心,我们已在腹部入路和胃袖状部狭窄方面对LSG技术进行了标准化。在分离大网膜和胃短血管后,使用Endo-GIA沿着34-F的胃管切除大弯侧。剩余的胃袖状部容积约为100毫升。
逐步介绍了标准化的LSG手术。将手术数据和早期结果与一组匹配的可调节胃束带术患者进行比较,结果显示两种技术在手术时间、手术并发症和术后6个月体重减轻方面无差异。
通过我们的标准化LSG技术,可以评估LSG与其他标准化减肥手术(如LAGB或LRYGBP)相比的积极方面。