Angeles-Llerenas Angélica R, Wirtz Veronika, Lara-Alvarez César Francisco
Centro de Investigación en Sistemas de Salud, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Mexico.
Dev World Bioeth. 2009 Apr;9(1):18-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2007.00208.x. Epub 2007 Sep 10.
Various mechanisms to ensure the protection of subjects in human research have been suggested, including the presence of witnesses during the informed consent process. For our commentary on the use of witnesses and their potential role and responsibility during the consent process, we start by addressing current guidelines for human subjects research in four Latin American countries. By using examples from public health research, we highlight some of the practical difficulties of using witnessed consent, from becoming a meaningless ritual at one end of the spectrum to the research subject feeling intimidated or coerced to participate at the other. Apart from these practical difficulties, it is unclear what responsibility the witness could and should have. We argue that there are important ethical questions about the role of witnesses that have not been adequately addressed in national and international regulations. This work addresses these gaps and argues that more debate is required to define the role and responsibilities of witnesses in the consent process, their training requirements and whether a universal legal requirement for witnessed consent, regardless of the type of research, is desirable.
人们提出了各种确保在人体研究中保护受试者的机制,包括在知情同意过程中有证人在场。对于我们关于证人的使用及其在同意过程中的潜在作用和责任的评论,我们首先讨论四个拉丁美洲国家目前关于人体受试者研究的指导方针。通过使用公共卫生研究中的例子,我们强调了使用见证同意的一些实际困难,从一端变成毫无意义的仪式到另一端研究对象感到受到恐吓或被迫参与。除了这些实际困难,证人能够并且应该承担什么责任尚不清楚。我们认为,关于证人的作用存在一些重要的伦理问题,而国家和国际法规并未充分解决这些问题。这项工作弥补了这些差距,并认为需要更多的辩论来界定证人在同意过程中的作用和责任、他们的培训要求,以及是否无论研究类型如何,都需要对见证同意提出普遍的法律要求。