• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

涉及人类受试者的研究伦理委员会。

Committees for Ethics in Research involving human subjects.

作者信息

Hossne William Saad, Vieira Sonia, De Freitas Corina Bontempo Duca

机构信息

Botucatu Medical School, UNESP- São Paulo State University.

出版信息

J Int Bioethique. 2008 Mar-Jun;19(1-2):131-41, 200.

PMID:18664006
Abstract

In Brazil since October 1996 there have been guidelines for research involving human subjects. Now human subjects know when their treatment is part of research. Deceit is no longer tolerated. But is not enough to say we offer an explanation to the potential subject and we offer a choice before he or she is confronted with an informed consent form. As in all professional activity, scientific investigation needs social controls. In Brazil, the ultimate responsibility of an investigation lies on the investigator, but in every institution where research is carried out there is a Committee for Ethics in Research. All Committees are subordinated to the National Commission of Ethics in Research, which is submitted to the Brazilian Institute of Health. During 2005 around 17,000 protocols involving 700,000 human subjects were revised by 475 Committees distributed all over the country. Approximately 7,000 people are now working in these Committees.

摘要

自1996年10月起,巴西就出台了涉及人类受试者研究的指导方针。现在,人类受试者知道他们的治疗何时属于研究范畴。欺骗行为不再被容忍。但仅仅说我们在潜在受试者面对知情同意书之前向其提供解释并给予选择是不够的。如同在所有专业活动中一样,科学研究需要社会监督。在巴西,调查的最终责任在于研究者,但在开展研究的每个机构都设有研究伦理委员会。所有委员会都隶属于国家研究伦理委员会,该委员会隶属于巴西卫生研究院。2005年期间,全国475个委员会对约17000项涉及70万名人类受试者的研究方案进行了审查。目前约有7000人在这些委员会工作。

相似文献

1
Committees for Ethics in Research involving human subjects.涉及人类受试者的研究伦理委员会。
J Int Bioethique. 2008 Mar-Jun;19(1-2):131-41, 200.
2
Pharmaceutical research: paradox, challenge or dilemma?药物研究:悖论、挑战还是困境?
East Mediterr Health J. 2006;12 Suppl 1:S42-9.
3
The role and responsibilities of witnesses in the informed consent process.证人在知情同意过程中的角色与职责。
Dev World Bioeth. 2009 Apr;9(1):18-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2007.00208.x. Epub 2007 Sep 10.
4
Rethinking research ethics.重新思考研究伦理。
Am J Bioeth. 2005 Winter;5(1):7-28. doi: 10.1080/15265160590900678.
5
Response to open peer commentaries on "assessing the remedy: the case for contracts in clinical trials".对关于“评估补救措施:临床试验中的合同问题”的公开同行评论的回应
Am J Bioeth. 2011 Apr;11(4):W1-3. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.572489.
6
An ethically justified framework for clinical investigation to benefit pregnant and fetal patients.为使孕妇和胎儿患者受益而进行临床研究的伦理正当框架。
Am J Bioeth. 2011 May;11(5):39-49. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.562595.
7
The basics of human subjects protection.人类受试者保护的基本原则。
Medsurg Nurs. 2006 Apr;15(2):95-8; quiz 99.
8
Ethics in a scientific approach: the importance of the biostatistician in research ethics committees.科学方法中的伦理学:生物统计学家在研究伦理委员会中的重要性。
J Med Ethics. 2008 Apr;34(4):297-300. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.019349.
9
Informed consent in clinical research: policies and practices in Singapore.临床研究中的知情同意:新加坡的政策与实践
J Biolaw Bus. 2003;6(1):65-75.
10
Undue inducement: nonsense on stilts?不当诱导:无稽之谈?
Am J Bioeth. 2005 Sep-Oct;5(5):9-13; discussion W8-11, W17. doi: 10.1080/15265160500244959.

引用本文的文献

1
Current status of residency training in laparoscopic surgery in Brazil: a critical review.巴西腹腔镜手术住院医师培训的现状:批判性综述
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2015;28(1):81-5. doi: 10.1590/S0102-67202015000100020.
2
Institutional review boards and bioethical issues for otologists and audiologists.耳科医生和听力学家的机构审查委员会及生物伦理问题。
Korean J Audiol. 2012 Sep;16(2):43-6. doi: 10.7874/kja.2012.16.2.43. Epub 2012 Sep 20.