Veerbeek Laetitia, van Zuylen Lia, Swart Siebe J, van der Maas Paul J, de Vogel-Voogt Elsbeth, van der Rijt Carin Cd, van der Heide Agnes
Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Palliat Med. 2008 Mar;22(2):145-51. doi: 10.1177/0269216307087164.
We studied the effect of the Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP) on the documentation of care, symptom burden and communication in three health care settings. Between November 2003 and February 2005 (baseline period), the care was provided as usual. Between February 2005 and February 2006 (intervention period), the LCP was used for all patients for whom the dying phase had started. After death of the patient, a nurse and a relative filled in a questionnaire. In the baseline period, 219 nurses and 130 relatives filled in a questionnaire for 220 deceased patients. In the intervention period, 253 nurses and 139 relatives filled in a questionnaire for 255 deceased patients. The LCP was used for 197 of them. In the intervention period, the documentation of care was significantly more comprehensive compared with the baseline period, whereas the average total symptom burden was significantly lower in the intervention period. LCP use contributes to the quality of documentation and symptom control.
我们研究了利物浦临终关怀路径(LCP)在三种医疗环境下对护理记录、症状负担及沟通情况的影响。在2003年11月至2005年2月(基线期),护理按常规方式提供。在2005年2月至2006年2月(干预期),LCP应用于所有已进入临终阶段的患者。患者死亡后,一名护士和一名家属填写一份问卷。在基线期,219名护士和130名家属为220名已故患者填写了问卷。在干预期,253名护士和139名家属为255名已故患者填写了问卷。其中197名患者使用了LCP。在干预期,护理记录比基线期显著更全面,而干预期的平均总症状负担显著更低。使用LCP有助于提高护理记录质量和症状控制水平。