Docherty Andrea, Owens Alastair, Asadi-Lari Mohsen, Petchey Roland, Williams Jacky, Carter Yvonne H
Worcestershire PCT.
Palliat Med. 2008 Mar;22(2):153-71. doi: 10.1177/0269216307085343.
To review current understanding of the knowledge and information needs of informal caregivers in palliative settings.
Seven electronic databases were searched for the period January 1994--November 2006: Medline, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Embase, Ovid, Zetoc and Pubmed using a meta-search engine (Metalib). Key journals and reference lists of selected papers were hand searched.
Included studies were peer-reviewed journal articles presenting original research. Given a variety of approaches to palliative care research, a validated systematic review methodology for assessing disparate evidence was used in order to assign scores to different aspects of each study (introduction and aims, method and data, sampling, data analysis, ethics and bias, findings/results, transferability/generalizability, implications and usefulness). Analysis was assisted by abstraction of the key details of each study into a table.
Thirty-four studies were included from eight different countries. The evidence was strongest in relation to pain management, where inadequacies in caregiver knowledge and the importance of education were emphasized. The significance of effective communication and information sharing between patient, caregiver and service provider was also emphasized. The evidence for other caregiver knowledge and information needs, for example in relation to welfare and social support, was weaker. There was limited literature on non-cancer conditions and the care-giving information needs of black and minority ethnic populations. Overall, the evidence base was predominantly descriptive and dominated by small-scale studies, limiting generalizability.
As palliative care shifts into patients' homes, a more rigorously researched evidence base devoted to understanding caregivers knowledge and information needs is required. Research design needs to move beyond the current focus on dyads to incorporate the complex, three-way interactions between patients, service providers and caregivers in end-of-life care settings.
回顾目前对姑息治疗环境中非正式照护者知识和信息需求的理解。
使用元搜索引擎(Metalib)在1994年1月至2006年11月期间检索了七个电子数据库:医学索引数据库(Medline)、护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)、心理学文摘数据库(PsychINFO)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(Embase)、Ovid、Zetoc和医学期刊数据库(Pubmed)。对手检关键期刊和所选论文的参考文献列表进行了检索。
纳入的研究为发表原创研究的同行评审期刊文章。鉴于姑息治疗研究方法多样,采用了经过验证的系统综述方法来评估不同的证据,以便为每项研究的不同方面(引言和目的、方法和数据、抽样、数据分析、伦理和偏差、研究结果、可转移性/普遍性、意义和实用性)打分。通过将每项研究的关键细节提炼到表格中来辅助分析。
纳入了来自八个不同国家的34项研究。在疼痛管理方面证据最为充分,其中强调了照护者知识的不足以及教育的重要性。还强调了患者、照护者和服务提供者之间有效沟通和信息共享的重要性。关于其他照护者知识和信息需求(例如福利和社会支持方面)的证据则较弱。关于非癌症疾病以及黑人和少数族裔人群照护信息需求的文献有限。总体而言,证据基础主要是描述性的,且以小规模研究为主,限制了普遍性。
随着姑息治疗转向患者家中,需要一个经过更严格研究的证据基础,专门用于理解照护者的知识和信息需求。研究设计需要超越目前对二元组的关注,纳入临终关怀环境中患者、服务提供者和照护者之间复杂的三方互动。