Suppr超能文献

妇科癌症患者接受专科护士护理的体验:一项定性系统综述。

Experiences of gynecological cancer patients receiving care from specialist nurses: a qualitative systematic review.

作者信息

Cook Olivia, McIntyre Meredith, Recoche Katrina, Lee Susan

机构信息

1School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia 2The Centre for Chronic Disease Management: a Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Aug;15(8):2087-2112. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003126.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The care needs of women with gynecological cancer are complex and change over the course of their cancer journey. Specialist nurses are well positioned to play a role in meeting the needs of women with gynecological cancer although their role and scope of practice have not been well defined. As patients are a key stakeholder, understanding their experience of care is an important step in better defining the role and scope of practice of specialist nurses in gynecological oncology in Australia and New Zealand.

OBJECTIVES

This review sought to consider gynecological cancer patients' experiences of specialist nursing care. Exploring the patient's experience of care by a specialist nurse is one step in the process of better defining the role and scope of practice of specialist gynecological-oncology nurses in Australia and New Zealand.

INCLUSION CRITERIA TYPES OF PARTICIPANTS

This review included studies with a focus on women with gynecological cancer who had been cared for by a specialist nurse. Studies of women with gynecological cancer at any point on the continuum of care from pre-diagnosis to survivorship or end of life, including those with a recurrence of the disease, were included, with no limit to the duration of care received for inclusion in the review.

PHENOMENA OF INTEREST

Studies that explored how women with gynecological cancer experience the care and interventions of specialist nurses were included.

TYPES OF STUDIES

Qualitative studies including, but not limited to, designs such as phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography, action research and feminist research were considered for review. This review also considered the qualitative components of mixed method studies.

CONTEXT

Research conducted in any country was considered for inclusion in this review providing that the study was reported in English. Studies conducted in any setting including, but not limited to, acute hospitals, outpatient/ambulatory clinics, chemotherapy or radiotherapy units, support groups, palliative care units or the patient's home were included.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A three-step search strategy was utilized in this review. An initial limited search of MEDLINE and CINAHL was undertaken followed by a comprehensive search using all identified keywords and index terms across all included databases. The reference lists of all identified reports and articles were hand searched for additional studies.

METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY

Each paper was independently assessed by two independent reviewers for methodological validity prior to inclusion in the review using the standardized critical appraisal instrument from the Joanna Briggs Institute the Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument. When disagreement arose between the reviewers, the given paper was independently appraised by a third reviewer.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were extracted from papers included in the review using the standardized data extraction tool from Joanna Briggs Institute the Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument. Data extraction was completed independently by two reviewers.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Extracted findings from seven included papers were grouped according to similarity in meaning from which 11 categories were developed. These categories were then subjected to a meta-synthesis that produced a set of three synthesized findings.

RESULTS

Key findings were extracted from six included papers and classified as unequivocal (U) or credible (C). A total of 30 findings were extracted and aggregated into 11 categories based on similarity in meaning. From the 11 categories, three synthesized findings were developed: i) Tailored care: specialist nurses play a role in understanding and meeting the individual needs of women with gynecological cancer; ii) Accessible care: specialist nurses guide women with gynecological cancer along the continuum of care and are an easily accessed source of knowledge and support; iii) Dependable expertise: women with gynecological cancer express trust and reassurance in the experience and expertise of the specialist nurse.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review synthesized the findings of seven studies that captured the experiences of women with gynecological cancer who received care from a specialist nurse. The specialist nurse offers tailored, accessible and expert care to women with gynecological cancer. From the synthesis it is recommended that women with gynecological cancer have access to the services of a specialist nurse at key points on the continuum of care, that specialist nurses provide information to patients on their disease and treatment in the form preferred by the patient and ensure that this information has been understood, and that specialist nurses are afforded time to spend with patients to enable greater exploration and identification of patient needs and the provision of personalized care. Further study that considers other key stakeholders in the specialist nurse role in gynecological oncology is recommended in order to gain a full understanding of specialist nurses' contribution to the care of women with gynecological cancer. Additionally, it is recommended that further studies be conducted to seek the perspectives of women with gynecological cancer from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds and Indigenous populations on specialist nursing care as they appear to be under-represented in current research.

摘要

背景

妇科癌症女性患者的护理需求复杂,且在其癌症治疗过程中会发生变化。专科护士在满足妇科癌症女性患者的需求方面具有重要作用,尽管其角色和实践范围尚未得到明确界定。由于患者是关键利益相关者,了解她们的护理体验是更好地界定澳大利亚和新西兰妇科肿瘤专科护士的角色和实践范围的重要一步。

目的

本综述旨在探讨妇科癌症患者对专科护理的体验。通过专科护士探索患者的护理体验是更好地界定澳大利亚和新西兰专科妇科肿瘤护士的角色和实践范围过程中的一步。

纳入标准 参与者类型:本综述纳入了重点关注接受专科护士护理的妇科癌症女性患者的研究。纳入了从诊断前到生存期或生命末期护理连续过程中任何阶段的妇科癌症女性患者的研究,包括疾病复发的患者,纳入综述的护理持续时间无限制。

感兴趣的现象

纳入了探索妇科癌症女性患者如何体验专科护士的护理和干预措施的研究。

研究类型

定性研究,包括但不限于现象学、扎根理论、民族志、行动研究和女性主义研究等设计,均在考虑范围内以供综述。本综述还考虑了混合方法研究中的定性部分。

背景

无论在哪个国家进行的研究,只要以英文发表,均考虑纳入本综述。纳入了在任何环境下进行的研究,包括但不限于急症医院、门诊/流动诊所、化疗或放疗科室、支持小组、姑息治疗科室或患者家中。

检索策略

本综述采用了三步检索策略。首先对MEDLINE和CINAHL进行了初步的有限检索,然后使用所有确定的关键词和索引词在所有纳入的数据库中进行全面检索。对所有确定的报告和文章的参考文献列表进行手工检索以查找其他研究。

方法学质量

在纳入综述之前,由两名独立评审员使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的标准化批判性评估工具《定性评估与综述工具》对每篇论文的方法学有效性进行独立评估。当评审员之间出现分歧时,由第三位评审员对给定的论文进行独立评估。

数据提取

使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的标准化数据提取工具《定性评估与综述工具》从纳入综述的论文中提取数据。数据提取由两名评审员独立完成。

数据综合

从七篇纳入论文中提取的研究结果根据意义相似性进行分组,由此形成了11个类别。然后对这些类别进行元综合,得出了一组三个综合研究结果。

结果

从六篇纳入论文中提取了关键研究结果,并分为明确(U)或可信(C)两类。总共提取了30个研究结果,并根据意义相似性汇总为11个类别。从这11个类别中,得出了三个综合研究结果:i)个性化护理:专科护士在了解和满足妇科癌症女性患者的个体需求方面发挥作用;ii)可及性护理:专科护士在护理连续过程中指导妇科癌症女性患者,并且是易于获取的知识和支持来源;iii)可靠的专业知识:妇科癌症女性患者对专科护士的经验和专业知识表示信任并感到安心。

结论

本系统综述综合了七项研究的结果,这些研究记录了接受专科护士护理的妇科癌症女性患者的体验。专科护士为妇科癌症女性患者提供个性化、可及性和专业性的护理。综合分析建议,妇科癌症女性患者在护理连续过程的关键点上能够获得专科护士的服务,专科护士应以患者喜欢的形式向患者提供有关其疾病和治疗的信息,并确保患者理解这些信息,并且专科护士应有时间与患者相处,以便更好地探索和确定患者需求并提供个性化护理。建议进行进一步研究,考虑妇科肿瘤专科护士角色中的其他关键利益相关者,以便全面了解专科护士对妇科癌症女性患者护理的贡献。此外,建议进行进一步研究,以寻求来自文化和语言背景多样的女性患者以及原住民群体对专科护理的看法,因为她们在当前研究中似乎代表性不足。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验