Petrusic William M, Shaki Samuel, Leth-Steensen Craig
Department of Psychology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Percept Psychophys. 2008 Feb;70(2):179-89. doi: 10.3758/pp.70.2.179.
Semantic congruity effects (SCEs) were obtained in each of two experiments, one with symbolic comparisons and the other with comparisons of visual extents. SCEs were reliably larger when the instructions indicating the direction of the comparison were represented by consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) nonsense syllables, which had been associated with the conventional instructions in a preliminary learning phase of the experiment. Enhanced SCEs with the CVC instructions were evident, especially when stimulus pair location and instruction direction did not match. This finding is not readily explained by any non-evidence-accrual theories of the SCE (e.g., expectancy, semantic coding, and reference point) or by their accrual-based extensions. On the other hand, the general class of evidence-accrual views of SCEs, such as those developed in Leth-Steensen and Marley (2000) and in Petrusic (1992), receive considerable empirical support when the locus of the SCE is specified in terms of the congruency of stimulus pair location and the direction of the instruction.
在两个实验中均获得了语义一致性效应(SCEs),一个实验采用符号比较,另一个实验采用视觉范围比较。当指示比较方向的指令由辅音-元音-辅音(CVC)无意义音节表示时,SCEs可靠地更大,这些音节在实验的初步学习阶段已与传统指令相关联。CVC指令增强的SCEs很明显,特别是当刺激对位置和指令方向不匹配时。这一发现不易用SCE的任何非证据积累理论(例如预期、语义编码和参考点)或其基于积累的扩展来解释。另一方面,当根据刺激对位置的一致性和指令方向来指定SCE的位置时,SCE的证据积累观点的一般类别,如Leth-Steensen和Marley(2000年)以及Petrusic(1992年)中提出的那些观点,得到了相当多的实证支持。