• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子病历辅助设计整群随机试验以改善糖尿病护理及治疗效果。

Electronic medical record-assisted design of a cluster-randomized trial to improve diabetes care and outcomes.

作者信息

Love Thomas E, Cebul Randall D, Einstadter Douglas, Jain Anil K, Miller Holly, Harris C Martin, Greco Peter J, Husak Scott S, Dawson Neal V

机构信息

Center for Health Care Research and Policy, Case Western Reserve University-MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44109-1998, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Apr;23(4):383-91. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0454-3.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-007-0454-3
PMID:18373134
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2359510/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Electronic medical records (EMRs) have the potential to facilitate the design of large cluster-randomized trials (CRTs).

OBJECTIVE

To describe the design of a CRT of clinical decision support to improve diabetes care and outcomes.

METHODS

In the Diabetes Improvement Group-Intervention Trial (DIG-IT), we identified and balanced preassignment characteristics of 12,675 diabetic patients cared for by 147 physicians in 24 practices of 2 systems using the same vendor's EMR. EMR-facilitated disease management was system A's experimental intervention; system B interventions involved patient empowerment, with or without disease management. For our sample, we: (1) identified characteristics associated with response to interventions or outcomes; (2) summarized feasible partitions of 10 system A practices (2 groups) and 14 system B practices (3 groups) using intra-cluster correlation coefficients (ICCs) and standardized differences; (3) selected (blinded) partitions to effectively balance the characteristics; and (4) randomly assigned groups of practices to interventions.

RESULTS

In System A, 4,306 patients, were assigned to 2 groups of practices; 8,369 patients in system B were assigned to 3 groups of practices. Nearly all baseline outcome variables and covariates were well-balanced, including several not included in the initial design. DIG-IT's balance was superior to alternative partitions based on volume, geography or demographics alone.

CONCLUSIONS

EMRs facilitated rigorous CRT design by identifying large numbers of patients with diabetes and enabling fair comparisons through preassignment balancing of practice sites. Our methods can be replicated in other settings and for other conditions, enhancing the power of other translational investigations.

摘要

背景

电子病历(EMR)有潜力促进大型整群随机试验(CRT)的设计。

目的

描述一项用于改善糖尿病护理及结局的临床决策支持整群随机试验的设计。

方法

在糖尿病改善组干预试验(DIG-IT)中,我们利用同一供应商的电子病历,识别并平衡了2个系统中24家医疗机构的147名医生所护理的12675名糖尿病患者的预分配特征。电子病历辅助的疾病管理是系统A的实验性干预措施;系统B的干预措施包括患者赋权,有或没有疾病管理。对于我们的样本,我们:(1)识别与干预反应或结局相关的特征;(2)使用组内相关系数(ICC)和标准化差异总结10家系统A医疗机构(2组)和14家系统B医疗机构(3组)的可行分组;(3)选择(盲法)分组以有效平衡这些特征;(4)将医疗机构组随机分配至干预措施。

结果

在系统A中,4306名患者被分配至2组医疗机构;系统B中的8369名患者被分配至3组医疗机构。几乎所有基线结局变量和协变量都得到了很好的平衡,包括一些最初设计中未纳入的变量。DIG-IT的平衡优于仅基于数量、地理位置或人口统计学的其他分组。

结论

电子病历通过识别大量糖尿病患者并通过医疗机构预分配平衡实现公平比较,促进了严谨的整群随机试验设计。我们的方法可在其他环境和针对其他病症中复制,增强其他转化研究的效力。

相似文献

1
Electronic medical record-assisted design of a cluster-randomized trial to improve diabetes care and outcomes.电子病历辅助设计整群随机试验以改善糖尿病护理及治疗效果。
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Apr;23(4):383-91. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0454-3.
2
Employing the electronic health record to improve diabetes care: a multifaceted intervention in an integrated delivery system.利用电子健康记录改善糖尿病护理:综合医疗服务体系中的多方面干预措施。
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Apr;23(4):379-82. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0439-2.
3
Improving diabetes management with electronic medical records.利用电子病历改善糖尿病管理。
Diabetes Metab. 2011 Dec;37 Suppl 4:S48-52. doi: 10.1016/S1262-3636(11)70965-X.
4
From concept to application: the impact of a community-wide intervention to improve the delivery of preventive services to children.从概念到应用:一项全社区干预措施对改善儿童预防性服务提供情况的影响。
Pediatrics. 2001 Sep;108(3):E42. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.3.e42.
5
Electronic medical records and diabetes quality of care: results from a sample of family medicine practices.电子病历与糖尿病医疗质量:来自家庭医疗实践样本的结果
Ann Fam Med. 2007 May-Jun;5(3):209-15. doi: 10.1370/afm.696.
6
Electronic medical record use by office-based physicians and their practices: United States, 2007.2007年美国门诊医生及其诊所对电子病历的使用情况
Natl Health Stat Report. 2010 Mar 31(23):1-11.
7
Physicians' use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions.医生对电子病历的使用:障碍与解决方案。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Mar-Apr;23(2):116-26. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.2.116.
8
The Logan Healthy Living Program: a cluster randomized trial of a telephone-delivered physical activity and dietary behavior intervention for primary care patients with type 2 diabetes or hypertension from a socially disadvantaged community--rationale, design and recruitment.洛根健康生活项目:一项针对来自社会弱势社区的2型糖尿病或高血压初级护理患者的电话干预身体活动和饮食行为的整群随机试验——原理、设计与招募
Contemp Clin Trials. 2008 May;29(3):439-54. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2007.10.005. Epub 2007 Nov 4.
9
Redesigning Primary Care to Improve Diabetes Outcomes (the UNITED Study).重新设计初级保健以改善糖尿病治疗效果(UNITED 研究)。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Mar;43(3):549-555. doi: 10.2337/dc19-1140. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
10
Ceiling effect in EMR system assimilation: a multiple case study in primary care family practices.电子病历系统同化中的天花板效应:基层医疗家庭诊所的多案例研究
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Apr 20;17(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0445-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Two Electronic Systems for Obtaining Diabetes Care Indicators in Clinical Practice.两种用于在临床实践中获取糖尿病护理指标的电子系统的比较。
Clin Diabetes. 2021 Apr;39(2):167-172. doi: 10.2337/cd20-0069.
2
Evaluating a post-implementation electronic medical record training intervention for diabetes management in primary care.评估基层医疗中糖尿病管理的电子病历实施后培训干预措施。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2019 Sep;26(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2019-100086.
3
The effect of computerized decision support systems on cardiovascular risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.计算机化决策支持系统对心血管风险因素的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Jun 10;19(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0824-x.
4
Hepatitis C: improving the quality of screening in a community hospital by implementing an electronic medical record intervention.丙型肝炎:通过实施电子病历干预提高社区医院的筛查质量。
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2015 May 20;4(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u208549.w3409. eCollection 2015.
5
Managing diabetes mellitus using information technology: a systematic review.利用信息技术管理糖尿病:一项系统综述。
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2015 Jun 3;14:49. doi: 10.1186/s40200-015-0174-x. eCollection 2015.
6
Comparative outcome studies of clinical decision support software: limitations to the practice of evidence-based system acquisition.临床决策支持软件的比较结果研究:基于证据的系统采购实践的局限性
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Apr;22(e1):e13-20. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocu033. Epub 2015 Feb 8.
7
Blocking for Sequential Political Experiments.顺序政治实验的分组
Polit Anal. 2013 Oct;21(4):507-523. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpt007.
8
Cluster randomized trial in the general practice research database: 2. Secondary prevention after first stroke (eCRT study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.全科医学研究数据库中的整群随机试验:2. 首次中风后的二级预防(eCRT 研究):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2012 Oct 3;13:181. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-181.
9
Using electronic medical records to measure and improve performance.利用电子病历衡量并改善医疗绩效。
Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2008;119:65-75; discussion 75-6.
10
Moving health information technology forward.推动健康信息技术向前发展。
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Apr;23(4):355-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0551-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Design of a clustered observational study to predict emergency admissions in the elderly: statistical reasoning in clinical practice.一项用于预测老年人急诊入院情况的整群观察性研究设计:临床实践中的统计推理
J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Apr;13(2):169-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00663.x.
2
A roadmap for national action on clinical decision support.国家临床决策支持行动路线图。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Mar-Apr;14(2):141-5. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2334. Epub 2007 Jan 9.
3
Sizing a trial to alter the trajectory of health behaviours: methods, parameter estimates, and their application.确定一项改变健康行为轨迹的试验规模:方法、参数估计及其应用。
Stat Med. 2007 May 20;26(11):2297-316. doi: 10.1002/sim.2714.
4
Effects of quality improvement strategies for type 2 diabetes on glycemic control: a meta-regression analysis.2型糖尿病质量改进策略对血糖控制的影响:一项Meta回归分析
JAMA. 2006 Jul 26;296(4):427-40. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.4.427.
5
Unintended consequences of caps on Medicare drug benefits.医疗保险药品福利上限的意外后果。
N Engl J Med. 2006 Jun 1;354(22):2349-59. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa054436.
6
A cluster randomized controlled trial comparing three methods of disseminating practice guidelines for children with croup [ISRCTN73394937].一项整群随机对照试验,比较三种为患有哮吼的儿童传播实践指南的方法[国际标准随机对照试验编号73394937]
Implement Sci. 2006 Apr 28;1:10. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-1-10.
7
Heart failure, chronic diuretic use, and increase in mortality and hospitalization: an observational study using propensity score methods.心力衰竭、长期使用利尿剂与死亡率及住院率增加:一项使用倾向评分法的观察性研究
Eur Heart J. 2006 Jun;27(12):1431-9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi890. Epub 2006 May 18.
8
Improvements in diabetes processes of care and intermediate outcomes: United States, 1988-2002.糖尿病护理流程及中间结果的改善:美国,1988 - 2002年
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Apr 4;144(7):465-74. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-7-200604040-00005.
9
Race, ethnicity, socioeconomic position, and quality of care for adults with diabetes enrolled in managed care: the Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) study.种族、族裔、社会经济地位以及参加管理式医疗的成年糖尿病患者的医疗质量:糖尿病研究成果转化行动(TRIAD)研究
Diabetes Care. 2005 Dec;28(12):2864-70. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.12.2864.
10
Lessons for cluster randomized trials in the twenty-first century: a systematic review of trials in primary care.21世纪整群随机试验的经验教训:基层医疗试验的系统评价
Clin Trials. 2004 Feb;1(1):80-90. doi: 10.1191/1740774504cn006rr.