de Morton Natalie A, Keating Jennifer L, Davidson Megan
Department of Physiotherapy, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Apr;89(4):641-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.10.021.
To investigate the validity of item score summation for the original and modified versions of the Barthel Index.
Rasch analysis of Barthel Index data.
General medical wards at 2 acute care hospitals in Australia.
Consecutive older medical patients (N=396).
Not applicable.
Activity limitation was assessed by using the Barthel Index at hospital admission and discharge. At 1 hospital site, the original Barthel Index was used, and at the other hospital site the Modified Barthel Index (MBI) was used.
More than half of the items showed misfit to the Rasch model for both versions of the Barthel Index. The continence items appear to measure a different construct to the other items. After the removal of the continence items, data for the remaining items still did not fit the Rasch model. Neither the original nor the MBI are unidimensional scales. An exception to this occurred when the original Barthel Index was rescored and only then for discharge and not for admission Barthel Index data.
Because clinicians do not typically rescore outcomes obtained by using the Barthel Index, these findings, combined with unacceptable ceiling effects, render the Barthel Index an assessment tool with limited validity for measuring and monitoring the health of older medical patients.
探讨巴氏指数原始版本和修订版本中项目得分相加的有效性。
对巴氏指数数据进行拉施分析。
澳大利亚2家急症医院的普通内科病房。
连续纳入的老年内科患者(N = 396)。
不适用。
在入院和出院时使用巴氏指数评估活动受限情况。在1个医院地点使用原始巴氏指数,在另1个医院地点使用修订巴氏指数(MBI)。
两个版本的巴氏指数中,超过半数的项目不符合拉施模型。失禁项目似乎测量的是与其他项目不同的结构。去除失禁项目后,其余项目的数据仍不符合拉施模型。原始巴氏指数和MBI均不是单维量表。唯一的例外是对原始巴氏指数重新计分后,且仅在出院时适用,入院时的巴氏指数数据不适用。
由于临床医生通常不会对使用巴氏指数获得的结果重新计分,这些发现加上不可接受的天花板效应,使得巴氏指数成为一种在测量和监测老年内科患者健康方面有效性有限的评估工具。