Suppr超能文献

在急性内科疾病入院后对住院老年患者进行评估时,巴氏指数的拉施分析。

Rasch analysis of the barthel index in the assessment of hospitalized older patients after admission for an acute medical condition.

作者信息

de Morton Natalie A, Keating Jennifer L, Davidson Megan

机构信息

Department of Physiotherapy, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Apr;89(4):641-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.10.021.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the validity of item score summation for the original and modified versions of the Barthel Index.

DESIGN

Rasch analysis of Barthel Index data.

SETTING

General medical wards at 2 acute care hospitals in Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

Consecutive older medical patients (N=396).

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Activity limitation was assessed by using the Barthel Index at hospital admission and discharge. At 1 hospital site, the original Barthel Index was used, and at the other hospital site the Modified Barthel Index (MBI) was used.

RESULTS

More than half of the items showed misfit to the Rasch model for both versions of the Barthel Index. The continence items appear to measure a different construct to the other items. After the removal of the continence items, data for the remaining items still did not fit the Rasch model. Neither the original nor the MBI are unidimensional scales. An exception to this occurred when the original Barthel Index was rescored and only then for discharge and not for admission Barthel Index data.

CONCLUSIONS

Because clinicians do not typically rescore outcomes obtained by using the Barthel Index, these findings, combined with unacceptable ceiling effects, render the Barthel Index an assessment tool with limited validity for measuring and monitoring the health of older medical patients.

摘要

目的

探讨巴氏指数原始版本和修订版本中项目得分相加的有效性。

设计

对巴氏指数数据进行拉施分析。

设置

澳大利亚2家急症医院的普通内科病房。

参与者

连续纳入的老年内科患者(N = 396)。

干预措施

不适用。

主要观察指标

在入院和出院时使用巴氏指数评估活动受限情况。在1个医院地点使用原始巴氏指数,在另1个医院地点使用修订巴氏指数(MBI)。

结果

两个版本的巴氏指数中,超过半数的项目不符合拉施模型。失禁项目似乎测量的是与其他项目不同的结构。去除失禁项目后,其余项目的数据仍不符合拉施模型。原始巴氏指数和MBI均不是单维量表。唯一的例外是对原始巴氏指数重新计分后,且仅在出院时适用,入院时的巴氏指数数据不适用。

结论

由于临床医生通常不会对使用巴氏指数获得的结果重新计分,这些发现加上不可接受的天花板效应,使得巴氏指数成为一种在测量和监测老年内科患者健康方面有效性有限的评估工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验