Daly Benjamin G, Dickman Chris R, Crowther Mathew S
Institute of Wildlife Research, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Ecology. 2008 Jan;89(1):65-76. doi: 10.1890/06-1991.1.
The deserts of central Australia contain richer communities of lizards than any other arid regions, with the highest diversity occurring in sand dune habitats dominated by hummock-forming spinifex grasses. To investigate the mechanisms that permit coexistence, we studied two species of coexisting agamid lizards that exhibit striking divergence in their use of habitat in the Simpson Desert of central Australia. Here, the military dragon Ctenophorus isolepis is restricted primarily to sites providing > 30% cover of hard spinifex Triodia basedowii, whereas the central netted dragon C. nuchalis occurs in areas with much sparser (< 10%) cover. We constructed four mechanistic models to explain this pattern and then derived hypotheses to test them. One hypothesis, that competition restricts each species to its preferred habitat, was rejected after dyad encounters in field enclosures failed to elicit any habitat shift or any overt interactions between the species. Our next hypotheses were that each species exhibits preferences for different thermal environments or different prey types and that each selects the habitats that maximize access to them. Both were supported. C. isolepis preferred lower temperatures when active and specialized in eating ants < 5 mm long and selected spinifex-dominated areas where these requirements were met. In contrast, C. nuchalis preferred higher temperatures and a diversity of prey, both of which were available mostly in open areas. Finally, we used plasticine models to test the hypothesis that each species faced lower risk of predation in its selected habitat. This was partly supported, as models of both species were attacked more often in the open than under spinifex cover. The results show that habitat divergence occurs along several, probably covarying, niche axes. We suggest that different levels of spinifex cover provide the template for a broad range of ecological interactions, allowing lizard species to partition biotic and abiotic resources and achieve the extraordinarily high levels of local diversity that are observed.
澳大利亚中部的沙漠拥有比其他任何干旱地区都更丰富的蜥蜴群落,沙丘栖息地的多样性最高,这些沙丘栖息地以形成小丘的三齿稃草为主。为了研究允许共存的机制,我们研究了两种共存的鬃狮蜥,它们在澳大利亚中部辛普森沙漠的栖息地利用上表现出显著差异。在这里,军龙鬃狮蜥主要局限于硬三齿稃草覆盖度超过30%的地点,而中部网纹鬃狮蜥则出现在覆盖度更稀疏(<10%)的区域。我们构建了四个机制模型来解释这种模式,然后推导假设来对其进行检验。其中一个假设是竞争将每个物种限制在其偏好的栖息地,在野外围栏中进行二元相遇实验后,该假设被否决,因为实验未能引发任何栖息地转移或物种间的任何明显相互作用。我们接下来的假设是每个物种对不同的热环境或不同的猎物类型表现出偏好,并且每个物种都选择能最大限度获取这些资源的栖息地。这两个假设都得到了支持。军龙鬃狮蜥活动时偏好较低温度,专门捕食体长小于5毫米的蚂蚁,并选择能满足这些条件的以三齿稃草为主的区域。相比之下,中部网纹鬃狮蜥偏好较高温度和多样化的猎物,而这些大多在开阔区域才有。最后,我们用橡皮泥模型来检验每个物种在其选择的栖息地面临较低捕食风险的假设。这一假设得到了部分支持,因为两个物种的模型在开阔区域比在三齿稃草覆盖下更容易受到攻击。结果表明,栖息地分化沿着几个可能相互关联的生态位轴发生。我们认为,不同程度的三齿稃草覆盖为广泛的生态相互作用提供了模板,使蜥蜴物种能够划分生物和非生物资源,并实现观察到的极高的局部多样性水平。