Research Associate, Desert Ecology Research Group, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 16;8(7):e68466. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068466. Print 2013.
Arid grasslands are used worldwide for grazing by domestic livestock, generating debate about how this pastoral enterprise may influence native desert biota. One approach to resolving this question is to experimentally reduce livestock numbers and measure the effects. However, a key challenge in doing this is that historical grazing impacts are likely to be cumulative and may therefore confound comparisons of the short-term responses of desert biota to changes in stocking levels. Arid areas are also subject to infrequent flooding rainfalls that drive productivity and dramatically alter abundances of flora and fauna. We took advantage of an opportunity to study the recent effects of a property-scale cattle removal on two properties with similarly varied grazing histories in central Australia. Following the removal of cattle in 2006 and before and after a significant rainfall event at the beginning of 2007, we sampled vegetation and small vertebrates on eight occasions until October 2008. Our results revealed significant interactions of time of survey with both grazing history and grazing removal for vascular plants, small mammals and reptiles. The mammals exhibited a three-way interaction of time, grazing history and grazing removal, thus highlighting the importance of careful sampling designs and timing for future monitoring. The strongest response to the cessation of grazing after two years was depressed reproductive output of plants in areas where cattle continued to graze. Our results confirm that neither vegetation nor small vertebrates necessarily respond immediately to the removal of livestock, but that rainfall events and cumulative grazing history are key determinants of floral and faunal performance in grassland landscapes with low and variable rainfall. We suggest that improved assessments could be made of the health of arid grazing environments if long-term monitoring were implemented to track the complex interactions that influence how native biota respond to grazing.
干旱草原在世界范围内被用于家畜放牧,这引发了关于这种畜牧业如何影响当地沙漠生物区系的争论。解决这个问题的一种方法是通过实验减少牲畜数量并测量其影响。然而,这样做的一个关键挑战是,历史放牧的影响可能是累积的,因此可能会混淆沙漠生物区系对放牧水平变化的短期反应的比较。干旱地区还会受到偶尔发生的洪水降雨的影响,这些降雨会提高生产力,并极大地改变动植物的丰度。我们利用了一个机会,研究了澳大利亚中部两个具有类似放牧历史的土地在最近一次大规模牛群移除后的影响。在 2006 年移除牛群之后,以及在 2007 年初的一次重大降雨事件之前和之后,我们在 2008 年 10 月之前的八次采样中对植被和小型脊椎动物进行了采样。我们的结果表明,调查时间与放牧历史和放牧移除对维管束植物、小型哺乳动物和爬行动物的影响存在显著的相互作用。哺乳动物表现出时间、放牧历史和放牧移除的三向相互作用,因此强调了未来监测中仔细采样设计和时间的重要性。在两年后停止放牧的反应最强烈的是,在牛群继续放牧的地区,植物的繁殖产量下降。我们的结果证实,无论是植被还是小型脊椎动物,都不一定会立即对牲畜的移除做出反应,但降雨事件和累积的放牧历史是低降雨量和变化降雨量草原景观中植物和动物表现的关键决定因素。我们建议,如果实施长期监测以跟踪影响本地生物区系对放牧反应的复杂相互作用,那么可以对干旱放牧环境的健康状况进行更好的评估。