• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

放牧调节着周丛生物量的空间变异性。

Grazing regulates the spatial variability of periphyton biomass.

作者信息

Hillebrand Helmut

机构信息

Botanical Institute, University of Cologne, Gyrhofstrasse 15, D-50931 Köln, Germany.

出版信息

Ecology. 2008 Jan;89(1):165-73. doi: 10.1890/06-1910.1.

DOI:10.1890/06-1910.1
PMID:18376558
Abstract

The presence of consumers not only alters the mean biomass of the prey assemblage, but also affects the spatial heterogeneity of biomass distribution. Whereas the mean prey biomass is generally reduced by consumer presence, the effect on spatial heterogeneity is less clear-cut. A meta-analysis of almost 600 field experiments manipulating the presence of benthic invertebrate or vertebrate grazers was conducted to analyze the effect of grazers on both the absolute spatial variability of periphyton biomass and the relative variability, which was standardized to the mean. Effects on absolute variability were measured as the log response ratio of the standard deviation of biomass (LR-SD), whereas effects on relative variability were measured as the log response ratio of the coefficient of variation of biomass (LR-CV). The overall magnitude and range of LR-SD and LR-CV indicated that grazers not only reduced periphyton biomass, but also substantially altered their spatial distribution. However, grazer effects differed strongly for absolute and relative variability. On average, grazers reduced the absolute spatial variability in prey biomass by 50% (average LR-SD = -0.68) but increased the relative variability by 24% (average LR-CV = 0.22). The magnitude of LR-SD strongly depended on the efficiency of grazing, with strong biomass removal leading to strong homogenization. Moreover, LR-CV and LR-SD were significantly affected by habitat type (freshwater vs. coastal) and substrata. Given the importance of spatial heterogeneity for resource uptake, competition and the maintenance of diversity, grazer presence has potentially strong indirect effects on the interactions within prey assemblages.

摘要

消费者的存在不仅改变了猎物组合的平均生物量,还影响了生物量分布的空间异质性。虽然消费者的存在通常会降低猎物的平均生物量,但对空间异质性的影响却不那么明确。我们对近600个操纵底栖无脊椎动物或脊椎动物食草动物存在的野外实验进行了荟萃分析,以分析食草动物对附生植物生物量的绝对空间变异性和相对变异性(标准化为平均值)的影响。对绝对变异性的影响以生物量标准差的对数响应比(LR-SD)来衡量,而对相对变异性的影响以生物量变异系数的对数响应比(LR-CV)来衡量。LR-SD和LR-CV的总体大小和范围表明,食草动物不仅减少了附生植物生物量,还显著改变了它们的空间分布。然而,食草动物对绝对变异性和相对变异性的影响差异很大。平均而言,食草动物使猎物生物量的绝对空间变异性降低了50%(平均LR-SD = -0.68),但使相对变异性增加了24%(平均LR-CV = 0.22)。LR-SD的大小强烈依赖于放牧效率,大量生物量的去除导致强烈的同质化。此外,LR-CV和LR-SD受到栖息地类型(淡水与沿海)和基质的显著影响。鉴于空间异质性对资源获取、竞争和多样性维持的重要性,食草动物的存在可能对猎物组合内的相互作用产生强烈的间接影响。

相似文献

1
Grazing regulates the spatial variability of periphyton biomass.放牧调节着周丛生物量的空间变异性。
Ecology. 2008 Jan;89(1):165-73. doi: 10.1890/06-1910.1.
2
Consumers affect prey biomass and diversity through resource partitioning.消费者通过资源分配影响猎物的生物量和多样性。
Ecology. 2007 Oct;88(10):2468-73. doi: 10.1890/07-0263.1.
3
How do grazers affect periphyton heterogeneity in streams?食草动物如何影响溪流中的周丛生物异质性?
Oecologia. 2005 Feb;142(4):576-87. doi: 10.1007/s00442-004-1759-0. Epub 2004 Nov 16.
4
The role of trout in stream food webs: integrating evidence from field surveys and experiments.鳟鱼在溪流食物网中的作用:整合来自实地调查和实验的证据。
J Anim Ecol. 2006 Mar;75(2):421-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01063.x.
5
Ecological stoichiometry of indirect grazer effects on periphyton nutrient content.间接食草动物对附生植物养分含量影响的生态化学计量学
Oecologia. 2008 Mar;155(3):619-30. doi: 10.1007/s00442-007-0930-9. Epub 2007 Dec 5.
6
Biodiversity as both a cause and consequence of resource availability: a study of reciprocal causality in a predator-prey system.生物多样性作为资源可利用性的原因和结果:对捕食者 - 猎物系统中相互因果关系的一项研究。
J Anim Ecol. 2006 Mar;75(2):497-505. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01070.x.
7
Grazers, producer stoichiometry, and the light : nutrient hypothesis revisited.食草动物、生产者化学计量学与光:营养假说再探讨
Ecology. 2007 May;88(5):1142-52. doi: 10.1890/06-0923.
8
Intraguild indirect effects through trophic cascades between stream-dwelling fishes.通过溪流鱼类之间的营养级联产生的公会内部间接影响。
J Anim Ecol. 2006 Jan;75(1):167-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2005.01032.x.
9
The effect of grazing and nutrient supply on periphyton associated bacteria.放牧与养分供应对周丛生物相关细菌的影响。
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2005 Mar 1;52(1):31-41. doi: 10.1016/j.femsec.2004.10.003. Epub 2004 Nov 18.
10
META-ANALYSIS OF GRAZER CONTROL OF PERIPHYTON BIOMASS ACROSS AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS(1).跨水生生态系统的食草动物对周丛生物量控制的荟萃分析(1)。
J Phycol. 2009 Aug;45(4):798-806. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2009.00702.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Life History Strategies Drive Meso-Scale Distribution Patterns in Coastal Benthic Macroinvertebrates.生活史策略驱动沿海底栖大型无脊椎动物的中尺度分布模式。
Ecol Evol. 2024 Oct 25;14(10):e70461. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70461. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Direct and indirect effects of pesticides on a benthic grazer during its life cycle.农药在底栖食草动物生命周期中产生的直接和间接影响。
Environ Sci Eur. 2018;30(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12302-018-0165-x. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
3
Comparing two periphyton collection methods commonly used for stream bioassessment and the development of numeric nutrient standards.
比较两种常用于溪流生物评估的周丛生物采集方法以及数值营养标准的制定。
Environ Monit Assess. 2017 Jul;189(7):360. doi: 10.1007/s10661-017-6085-1. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
4
Activated chemical defenses suppress herbivory on freshwater red algae.激活的化学防御抑制淡水红藻上的食草作用。
Oecologia. 2013 Apr;171(4):921-33. doi: 10.1007/s00442-012-2455-0. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
5
New design strategy for development of specific primer sets for PCR-based detection of Chlorophyceae and Bacillariophyceae in environmental samples.基于PCR的环境样品中绿藻纲和硅藻纲检测特异性引物组开发的新设计策略
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Sep;75(17):5729-33. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00509-09. Epub 2009 Jul 10.
6
Ecological stoichiometry of indirect grazer effects on periphyton nutrient content.间接食草动物对附生植物养分含量影响的生态化学计量学
Oecologia. 2008 Mar;155(3):619-30. doi: 10.1007/s00442-007-0930-9. Epub 2007 Dec 5.