Sciubba Daniel M, Noggle Joseph C, Vellimana Ananth K, Conway James E, Kretzer Ryan M, Long Donlin M, Garonzik Ira M
Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, USA.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2008 Apr;8(4):327-34. doi: 10.3171/SPI/2008/8/4/327.
Laminar fixation of the axis with crossing bilateral screws has been shown to provide rigid fixation with a theoretically decreased risk of vertebral artery damage compared with C1-2 transarticular screw fixation and C-2 pedicle screw fixation. Some studies, however, have shown restricted rigidity of such screws compared with C-2 pedicle screws, and others note that anatomical variability exists within the posterior elements of the axis that may have an impact on successful placement. To elucidate the clinical impact of such screws, the authors report their experience in placing C-2 laminar screws in adult patients over a 2-year period, with emphasis on clinical outcome and technical placement.
Sixteen adult patients with cervical instability underwent posterior cervical and cervicothoracic fusion procedures at our institution with constructs involving C-2 laminar screws. Eleven patients were men and 5 were women, and they ranged in age from 28 to 84 years (mean 57 years). The reasons for fusion were degenerative disease (9 patients) and treatment of trauma (7 patients). In 14 patients (87.5%) standard translaminar screws were placed, and in 2 (12.5%) an ipsilateral trajectory was used. All patients underwent preoperative radiological evaluation of the cervical spine, including computed tomography scanning with multiplanar reconstruction to assess the posterior anatomy of C-2. Anatomical restrictions for placement of standard translaminar screws included a deeply furrowed spinous process and/or an underdeveloped midline posterior ring of the axis. In these cases, screws were placed into the corresponding lamina from the ipsilateral side, allowing bilateral screws to be oriented in a more parallel, as opposed to perpendicular, plane. All patients were followed for >2 years to record rates of fusion, instrumentation failure, and other complications.
Thirty-two screws were placed without neurological or vascular complications. The mean follow-up duration was 27.3 months. Complications included 2 revisions, one for pseudarthrosis and the other for screw pullout, and 3 postoperative infections.
Placement of laminar screws into the axis from the standard crossing approach or via an ipsilateral trajectory may allow a safe, effective, and durable means of including the axis in posterior cervical and cervicothoracic fusion procedures.
与C1-2经关节螺钉固定和C2椎弓根螺钉固定相比,双侧交叉螺钉对枢椎进行椎板固定已显示出能提供牢固固定,理论上可降低椎动脉损伤风险。然而,一些研究表明,与C2椎弓根螺钉相比,此类螺钉的刚度有限,其他研究指出枢椎后部结构存在解剖变异,这可能会影响螺钉的成功置入。为阐明此类螺钉的临床影响,作者报告了他们在2年期间为成年患者置入C2椎板螺钉的经验,重点关注临床结果和技术置入情况。
16例颈椎不稳的成年患者在我院接受了后路颈椎及颈胸段融合手术,植入物包括C2椎板螺钉。其中男性11例,女性5例,年龄范围为28至84岁(平均57岁)。融合的原因包括退行性疾病(9例)和创伤治疗(7例)。14例患者(87.5%)采用标准经椎板螺钉置入,2例(12.5%)采用同侧入路。所有患者术前均接受颈椎的影像学评估,包括计算机断层扫描及多平面重建,以评估C2的后部解剖结构。标准经椎板螺钉置入的解剖学限制包括棘突深沟和/或枢椎中线后环发育不全。在这些情况下,从同侧将螺钉置入相应的椎板,使双侧螺钉在更平行而非垂直的平面上定向。所有患者均随访超过2年,记录融合率、内固定失败率及其他并发症。
共置入32枚螺钉,未发生神经或血管并发症。平均随访时间为27.3个月。并发症包括2例翻修手术,1例为假关节形成,另1例为螺钉拔出,以及3例术后感染。
从标准交叉入路或通过同侧入路将椎板螺钉置入枢椎,可能是在后路颈椎及颈胸段融合手术中纳入枢椎的一种安全、有效且持久的方法。