Reed N S, Mangioni C, Malmström H, Scarfone G, Poveda A, Pecorelli S, Tateo S, Franchi M, Jobsen J J, Coens C, Teodorovic I, Vergote I, Vermorken J B
Beatson Oncology Centre, Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow G12 0YN, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Eur J Cancer. 2008 Apr;44(6):808-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.01.019. Epub 2008 Apr 2.
The management of uterine sarcomas continues to present many difficulties. Primary surgery is the optimal treatment but the role of post-operative radiation remains uncertain. In the mid-1980s, the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gynaecological Cancer Group Study proposed a trial to evaluate adjuvant radiotherapy, as previous non-randomised studies had suggested a survival advantage and improved local control when post-operative radiation was administered. The study opened in 1987 taking 13 years to accrue 224 patients. All uterine sarcoma subtypes were permitted. Patients were required to have undergone as a minimum, TAH and BSO and wahsings (166 patients) but nodal sampling was optional. There were 103 leiomyosarcomas (LMS), 91 carcinosarcomas (CS) and 28 endometrial stromal sarcomas (ESS). Patients were randomised to either observation or pelvic radiation, 51 Gy in 28 fractions over 5 weeks. Hundred and twelve were recruited to each arm. The initial analysis has shown a reduction in local relapse (14 versus 24, p=0.004) but no effect on either OS or PFS. No unexpected toxicity was seen in the radiation arm. No difference in either overall or disease-free survival was demonstrated but there is an increased local control for the CS patients receiving radiation but without any benefit for LMS. Prognostic factor analysis shows that stage, age and histological subtype were important predictors of behaviour which may explain differences between CS and LMS. CS appears to show more kinship to poorly differentiated endometrial carcinomas in behaviour. LMS did not show the same benefit from radiation. These results will help shape future management and clinical trials in uterine sarcomas.
子宫肉瘤的治疗仍然面临诸多困难。手术是主要的治疗方法,但术后放疗的作用仍不明确。20世纪80年代中期,欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织妇科癌症研究组提议进行一项试验,以评估辅助放疗,因为此前的非随机研究表明,术后放疗可带来生存优势并改善局部控制。该研究于1987年启动,历时13年招募了224名患者。所有子宫肉瘤亚型均被纳入。患者至少需接受全子宫双附件切除术及大网膜切除术(166例患者),但淋巴结取样为可选项目。其中有103例平滑肌肉瘤(LMS)、91例癌肉瘤(CS)和28例子宫内膜间质肉瘤(ESS)。患者被随机分为观察组或盆腔放疗组,5周内分28次给予51 Gy的放疗剂量。每组招募了112名患者。初步分析显示局部复发率有所降低(分别为14例和24例,p = 0.004),但对总生存期(OS)或无进展生存期(PFS)均无影响。放疗组未出现意外的毒性反应。总体生存期或无病生存期均未显示出差异,但接受放疗的CS患者局部控制有所改善,而LMS患者未从中获益。预后因素分析表明,分期、年龄和组织学亚型是行为的重要预测因素,这可能解释了CS和LMS之间的差异。CS在行为上似乎与低分化子宫内膜癌更为相似。LMS未从放疗中获得同样的益处。这些结果将有助于指导未来子宫肉瘤的治疗和临床试验。