Byhahn Christian, Nemetz Sebastian, Breitkreutz Raoul, Zwissler Bernhard, Kaufmann Manfred, Meininger Dirk
Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, and Pain Management, J.W. Goethe-University Medical School, Frankfurt/M, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, D-60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
Can J Anaesth. 2008 Apr;55(4):232-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03021507.
The Bonfils intubation fibrescope (BIF), a rigid, straight and reusable fibreoptic device, is being used increasingly to facilitate endotracheal intubation after direct laryngoscopy has failed. We tested the hypothesis that, with the BIF compared to direct laryngoscopy, the rate of failed endotracheal intubation could be reduced in patients with a difficult airway, simulated by means of a rigid cervical immobilization collar.
Seventy-six adults undergoing elective gynecological surgery under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to have endotracheal intubation, facilitated with either a standard size 3 Macintosh laryngoscope blade, or the BIF. A rigid cervical immobilization collar was used to simulate a difficult airway, by reducing mouth opening and limiting neck extension. If endotracheal intubation could not be achieved within two attempts, the cervical collar was removed, and direct laryngoscopy was performed thereafter, using a Macintosh blade in all subjects. The success rate of endotracheal tube placement was the primary outcome variable.
Patient characteristics were similar in the two groups. After neck immobilization, the inter-incisor distance was reduced to 2.6 +/- 0.7 cm (Macintosh) and 2.6 +/- 0.8 cm (BIF). Tube placement was successful in 15/38 (39.5%) patients with a Macintosh blade, and in 31/38 patients with the BIF (81.6%; P = 0.0003). Time required for tube placement was 53 +/- 22 sec (Macintosh) and 64 +/- 24 sec (BIF; P = 0.15).
The Bonfils intubation fibrescope is a more effective intubating device for patients with immobilized cervical spine and significantly limited inter-incisor distance, when compared to direct laryngoscopy.
邦菲尔斯插管纤维镜(BIF)是一种刚性、直型且可重复使用的纤维光学设备,在直接喉镜检查失败后,越来越多地用于辅助气管插管。我们检验了这样一个假设:对于通过刚性颈椎固定颈圈模拟的困难气道患者,与直接喉镜检查相比,使用BIF可降低气管插管失败率。
76例接受全身麻醉下择期妇科手术的成年患者被随机分配,使用标准尺寸3号麦金托什喉镜镜片或BIF辅助进行气管插管。通过减少开口度和限制颈部伸展,使用刚性颈椎固定颈圈模拟困难气道。如果两次尝试内无法完成气管插管,则移除颈圈,此后所有受试者均使用麦金托什镜片进行直接喉镜检查。气管导管置入成功率是主要结局变量。
两组患者的特征相似。颈部固定后,门齿间距减小至2.6±0.7cm(麦金托什组)和2.6±0.8cm(BIF组)。使用麦金托什镜片时,38例患者中有15例(39.5%)导管置入成功,使用BIF时,38例患者中有31例(81.6%)成功(P = 0.0003)。导管置入所需时间为53±22秒(麦金托什组)和64±24秒(BIF组;P = 0.15)。
与直接喉镜检查相比,邦菲尔斯插管纤维镜对于颈椎固定且门齿间距显著受限的患者是一种更有效的插管设备。