Suppr超能文献

多利培南与亚胺培南静脉输注治疗呼吸机相关性肺炎的疗效与安全性:一项多中心随机研究

Efficacy and safety of intravenous infusion of doripenem versus imipenem in ventilator-associated pneumonia: a multicenter, randomized study.

作者信息

Chastre Jean, Wunderink Richard, Prokocimer Philippe, Lee Michael, Kaniga Koné, Friedland Ian

机构信息

Service de Réanimation Médicale, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris 6, Paris, France.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2008 Apr;36(4):1089-96. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181691b99.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Doripenem is an investigational carbapenem with broad-spectrum activity against gram-negative and gram-positive pathogens, including multidrug-resistant strains, commonly responsible for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). This large, phase III study compared doripenem with imipenem for the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia.

DESIGN

Prospective, multicenter, parallel randomized, active-controlled, open-label study.

SETTING

Intensive care units.

PATIENTS

Adults (N = 531) who met clinical and radiologic criteria for ventilator-associated pneumonia.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were stratified by duration of mechanical ventilation (< 5 vs. > or = 5 days), severity of illness (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score < or = 15 vs. > 15), and geographic region and then randomly assigned to doripenem 500 mg every 8 hrs via a 4-hr intravenous infusion or imipenem 500 mg every 6 hrs or 1000 mg every 8 hrs via 30- or 60-min intravenous infusions, respectively, for 7-14 days.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary efficacy end points were the clinical cure rates in the clinical modified intent-to-treat (cMITT) and clinically evaluable populations. Doripenem was noninferior to imipenem (lower boundary of 95% confidence interval around the difference between treatments > or = -20%). Clinical cure rates were 68.3% (doripenem) and 64.2% (imipenem) in the clinically evaluable and 59.0% (doripenem) and 57.8% (imipenem) in the cMITT populations. In patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, clinical cure was 80.0% (doripenem) and 42.9% (imipenem) (p not significant); microbiological cure was 65.0% (doripenem) and 37.5% (imipenem). Only 18% (5 of 28) of P. aeruginosa isolates had minimum inhibitory concentration > or = 8 microg/mL at baseline or following therapy in the doripenem arm compared with 64% (16 of 25) in the imipenem treatment group (p = .001). Clinical cure rate was higher with doripenem than imipenem at higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores and older ages. Doripenem was generally well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large, phase III study of patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia, a 4-hr intravenous infusion of doripenem was clinically efficacious and therapeutically noninferior to imipenem.

摘要

目的

多利培南是一种处于研究阶段的碳青霉烯类抗生素,对革兰氏阴性菌和革兰氏阳性菌病原体具有广谱活性,包括多重耐药菌株,这些菌株通常是呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的病因。这项大型III期研究比较了多利培南与亚胺培南治疗呼吸机相关性肺炎的效果。

设计

前瞻性、多中心、平行随机、活性对照、开放标签研究。

地点

重症监护病房。

患者

符合呼吸机相关性肺炎临床和影像学标准的成人(N = 531)。

干预措施

根据机械通气时间(<5天与≥5天)、疾病严重程度(急性生理与慢性健康状况评分II<或=15与>15)和地理区域对患者进行分层,然后随机分配接受多利培南500mg每8小时一次,通过4小时静脉输注,或亚胺培南500mg每6小时一次或1000mg每8小时一次,分别通过30或60分钟静脉输注,持续7 - 14天。

测量指标和主要结果

主要疗效终点是临床改良意向性治疗(cMITT)和临床可评估人群的临床治愈率。多利培南不劣于亚胺培南(治疗组间差异的95%置信区间下限≥ - 20%)。临床可评估人群中多利培南和亚胺培南的临床治愈率分别为68.3%和64.2%,cMITT人群中分别为59.0%和57.8%。在铜绿假单胞菌患者中,临床治愈率多利培南为80.0%,亚胺培南为42.9%(p无统计学意义);微生物学治愈率多利培南为65.0%,亚胺培南为37.5%。多利培南组中,仅18%(28例中的5例)的铜绿假单胞菌分离株在基线或治疗后最小抑菌浓度≥8μg/mL,而亚胺培南治疗组为64%(25例中的16例)(p = 0.001)。在急性生理与慢性健康状况评分II较高以及年龄较大的患者中,多利培南的临床治愈率高于亚胺培南。多利培南总体耐受性良好。

结论

在这项针对呼吸机相关性肺炎患者的大型III期研究中,多利培南4小时静脉输注在临床上有效,治疗效果不劣于亚胺培南。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验