Brice Jane H, Friend Kevin D, Delbridge Theodore R
Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7594, USA.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2008 Apr-Jun;12(2):187-91. doi: 10.1080/10903120801907687.
Emergency medical services (EMS) research is frequently dependent on data recorded by prehospital personnel. Linking EMS information with hospital outcome depends on essential identifying data. We sought to determine the accuracy of these data in patients who activated EMS for chest pain and to describe the types of errors committed.
We performed a retrospective, consecutive case series study of all prehospital records for patients transported by the City of Pittsburgh Bureau of EMS (annual call volume, 60,000) for chest pain to three area hospitals during a three-month interval. Demographic data, including name, date of birth (DOB), and Social Security number (SSN), for each patient were extracted from the EMS record. These were compared to the definitive information in the hospital records.
360 prehospital records were examined, with 341 matches to hospital records. The correct patient name was recorded in 301 records (83.6%), the correct DOB was recorded 284 times (78.9%), and the correct SSN was recorded 120 times (33.3%). The overall error rate of demographic data recorded on EMS records was 73.9% (266/360). If SSN is not included as a demographic variable, then the overall error rate was 25.3% (91/360).
The use of EMS-generated demographic data demonstrates moderate agreement and linkage with hospital records. Name and DOB are more reliable data elements for matching than SSN. Future research should examine the impact of electronic medical records and EMS identification numbers on data reliability.
急诊医疗服务(EMS)研究常常依赖于院前急救人员记录的数据。将EMS信息与医院结局相联系取决于关键的识别数据。我们试图确定因胸痛呼叫EMS的患者这些数据的准确性,并描述所犯错误的类型。
我们对匹兹堡市EMS局(年呼叫量60,000)在三个月期间转运至三家地区医院的胸痛患者的所有院前记录进行了一项回顾性、连续病例系列研究。从EMS记录中提取每位患者的人口统计学数据,包括姓名、出生日期(DOB)和社会安全号码(SSN)。将这些数据与医院记录中的最终信息进行比较。
检查了360份院前记录,其中341份与医院记录匹配。301份记录(83.6%)中记录了正确的患者姓名,284次(78.9%)记录了正确的DOB,120次(33.3%)记录了正确的SSN。EMS记录上所记录的人口统计学数据的总体错误率为73.9%(266/360)。如果不将SSN作为人口统计学变量,则总体错误率为25.3%(91/360)。
使用EMS生成的人口统计学数据显示与医院记录有适度的一致性和关联性。姓名和DOB在匹配时比SSN是更可靠的数据元素。未来的研究应检查电子病历和EMS识别号码对数据可靠性的影响。