White Brian J, Walsh Michael, Egol Kenneth A, Tejwani Nirmal C
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases, 550 First Avenue, NBV 21W-37, New York, NY 10016, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Apr;90(4):731-4. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00733.
Ankle fracture-dislocations require urgent reduction to protect the soft tissues, to minimize articular injury, and to allow swelling to decrease. Conscious sedation is commonly used to provide analgesia for closed reduction of this injury. We hypothesized that an intra-articular block of the ankle would provide similar analgesia and the ability to reduce the ankle with a lower risk than conscious sedation.
Between September 2005 and January 2007, forty-two patients with an ankle fracture-dislocation presented to our emergency department and were enrolled in a prospective randomized study. The patients were given either conscious sedation or an intra-articular lidocaine block for the reduction and for the application of a plaster splint. After the reduction maneuver, the patients used a visual analog pain scale to rate the level of pain before, during, and after the procedure, from 1 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). The senior authors reviewed the injury and reduction radiographs to confirm the reduction of the ankle joint.
Twenty-one patients were randomized to each group. There was no difference in demographic data or fracture patterns between the groups. Both the sedation and the block reduced the pain to a similar degree. The pain reduction (the initial pain level minus the level of pain after medication was given or injected) was an average (and standard deviation) of 4.6 +/- 3.3 for the block group and 4.2 +/- 3.5 for the sedation group (p = 0.64). The average change in the level of pain between the initial presentation and during the reduction was 3.6 +/- 3.8 for the block group and 4.1 +/- 3.3 for the sedation group. Overall, there was no difference in analgesia provided by these two methods (p = 0.71). An acceptable reduction was achieved for forty-one of the forty-two patients with one failure in the sedation group. The average time for ankle reduction and stabilization in a splint was 81.5 minutes for the sedation group and 63.8 minutes for the block group.
Compared with conscious sedation, an intra-articular lidocaine block provides a similar degree of analgesia and sufficient analgesia to achieve closed reduction of ankle fracture-dislocations.
踝关节骨折脱位需要紧急复位,以保护软组织,减少关节损伤,并使肿胀消退。清醒镇静常用于为该损伤的闭合复位提供镇痛。我们假设踝关节内阻滞能提供类似的镇痛效果,且与清醒镇静相比,以更低的风险实现踝关节复位。
2005年9月至2007年1月期间,42例踝关节骨折脱位患者到我院急诊科就诊,并纳入一项前瞻性随机研究。患者在复位及应用石膏夹板时接受清醒镇静或关节内利多卡因阻滞。复位操作后,患者使用视觉模拟疼痛量表对操作前、操作期间及操作后的疼痛程度进行评分,范围为1分(无痛)至10分(剧痛)。资深作者复查损伤及复位后的X线片以确认踝关节复位情况。
每组随机分配21例患者。两组间人口统计学数据或骨折类型无差异。镇静和阻滞均使疼痛程度减轻相似。阻滞组疼痛减轻程度(初始疼痛水平减去给药或注射后疼痛水平)平均(及标准差)为4.6±3.3,镇静组为4.2±3.5(p = 0.64)。阻滞组从初始就诊到复位期间疼痛水平的平均变化为3.6±3.8,镇静组为4.1±3.3。总体而言,这两种方法提供的镇痛效果无差异(p = 0.71)。42例患者中有41例实现了可接受的复位,镇静组有1例失败。镇静组踝关节复位并固定于夹板的平均时间为81.5分钟,阻滞组为63.8分钟。
与清醒镇静相比,关节内利多卡因阻滞提供相似程度的镇痛效果,且能提供足够的镇痛以实现踝关节骨折脱位的闭合复位。