Suppr超能文献

跟腱断裂修复术后应用腘窝阻滞对减轻疼痛的疗效:一项前瞻性随机研究

Efficacy of popliteal block in postoperative pain control after ankle fracture fixation: a prospective randomized study.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, NYU Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Orthop Trauma. 2012 Oct;26(10):557-61. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182638b25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare postoperative pain control in patients treated surgically for ankle fractures who receive popliteal blocks with those who received general anesthesia alone.

DESIGN

Institutional Review Board approved prospective randomized study.

SETTING

Metropolitan tertiary-care referral center.

PATIENTS

All patients being treated with open reduction internal fixation for ankle fractures who met inclusion criteria and consented to participate were enrolled.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized to receive either general anesthesia (GETA) or intravenous sedation and popliteal block.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patients were assessed for duration of procedure, total time in the operating room, and postoperative pain at 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery using a visual analog scale.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients agreed to participate in the study. Twenty-five patients received popliteal block, while 26 patients received GETA. There were no anesthesia-related complications. At 2, 4, and 8 hours postoperatively, patients who underwent GETA demonstrated significantly higher pain. At 12 hours, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups with regard to pain control. However, by 24 hours, those who had received popliteal blocks had significantly higher pain with no difference by 48 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

Popliteal block provides equivalent postoperative pain control to general anesthesia alone in patients undergoing operative fixation of ankle fractures. However, patients who receive popliteal blocks do experience a significant increase in pain between 12 and 24 hours. Recognition of this "rebound pain" with early narcotic administration may allow patients to have more effective postoperative pain control.

摘要

目的

比较接受腘窝阻滞麻醉与单纯全身麻醉的踝关节骨折切开复位内固定术患者的术后疼痛控制效果。

设计

机构审查委员会批准的前瞻性随机研究。

地点

大都市三级保健转诊中心。

患者

所有符合纳入标准并同意参与的接受切开复位内固定术治疗踝关节骨折的患者均被纳入研究。

干预措施

患者随机分为全身麻醉(GETA)组或静脉镇静联合腘窝阻滞组。

主要观察指标

采用视觉模拟评分法评估患者的手术持续时间、手术室总时间和术后 2、4、8、12、24 和 48 小时的疼痛。

结果

51 例患者同意参与研究。25 例患者接受腘窝阻滞,26 例患者接受 GETA。无麻醉相关并发症。术后 2、4 和 8 小时,接受 GETA 的患者疼痛明显更高。12 小时时,两组之间的疼痛控制无显著差异。然而,24 小时时,接受腘窝阻滞的患者疼痛明显更高,48 小时时无差异。

结论

在接受踝关节骨折切开复位内固定术的患者中,腘窝阻滞与单纯全身麻醉的术后疼痛控制效果相当。然而,接受腘窝阻滞的患者在 12 至 24 小时之间确实会经历明显的疼痛增加。早期给予麻醉药物以认识到这种“反弹痛”可能使患者获得更有效的术后疼痛控制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验