Leboeuf Rebecca, Baumgartner Jacqueline E, Benezra Miriam, Malaguarnera Roberta, Solit David, Pratilas Christine A, Rosen Neal, Knauf Jeffrey A, Fagin James A
Department of Medicine and Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021, USA.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008 Jun;93(6):2194-201. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-2825. Epub 2008 Apr 1.
Mutually exclusive mutations of RET, RAS, or BRAF are present in about 70% of papillary thyroid carcinomas, whereas only the latter two are seen in poorly differentiated and anaplastic cancers. Although the signal output common to these oncoproteins is ERK, a recent report showed that only BRAF mutations consistently predicted responsiveness to MAPK kinase (MEK) inhibitors.
Here we investigated whether sensitivity to MEK inhibition was determined by oncogene status in 13 human thyroid cancer cell lines: four with BRAF mutations, four RAS, one RET/PTC1, and four wild type.
Growth of BRAF (+) cells was inhibited by the MEK antagonist PD0325901 with an IC(50) of less than 5 nm. By contrast, RAS, RET/PTC1, or wild-type cells had IC(50) of 4 nm to greater than 1000 nm. Sensitivity was not predicted by coexisting mutations in PIK3CA or by PTEN status. Similar effects were obtained with the MEK inhibitor AZD6244. PD0325901 induced a sustained G1/S arrest in BRAF (+) but not BRAF (-) lines. PD0325901 was equipotent at inhibiting pERK1/2 after 2 h, regardless of genetic background, but pERK rebounded at 24 h in most lines. MEK inhibitor resistance was associated with partial refractoriness of pERK to further inhibition by the compounds. AZD6244 was more potent at inhibiting growth of NPA (BRAF +) than Cal62 (KRAS +) xenografts.
Thyroid cancers with BRAF mutation are preferentially sensitive to MEK inhibitors, whereas tumors with other MEK-ERK effector pathway gene mutations have variable responses, either because they are only partially dependent on ERK and/or because feedback responses elicit partial refractoriness to MEK inhibition.
约70%的甲状腺乳头状癌存在RET、RAS或BRAF的互斥性突变,而在低分化癌和未分化癌中仅可见后两种突变。尽管这些癌蛋白的共同信号输出是ERK,但最近的一份报告显示,只有BRAF突变能持续预测对丝裂原活化蛋白激酶(MEK)抑制剂的反应性。
在此,我们研究了13种人甲状腺癌细胞系对MEK抑制的敏感性是否由癌基因状态决定:4种具有BRAF突变,4种具有RAS突变,1种具有RET/PTC1突变,4种为野生型。
BRAF(+)细胞的生长受到MEK拮抗剂PD0325901的抑制,IC(50)小于5纳米。相比之下,RAS、RET/PTC1或野生型细胞的IC(50)为4纳米至大于1000纳米。PIK3CA中共存的突变或PTEN状态无法预测敏感性。使用MEK抑制剂AZD6244也获得了类似的效果。PD0325901在BRAF(+)细胞系中诱导持续的G1/S期阻滞,但在BRAF(-)细胞系中则不然。无论基因背景如何,PD0325901在2小时后抑制pERK1/2的效力相同,但在大多数细胞系中,pERK在24小时时反弹。MEK抑制剂耐药性与pERK对化合物进一步抑制的部分难治性相关。AZD6244在抑制NPA(BRAF +)异种移植瘤生长方面比Cal62(KRAS +)更有效。
具有BRAF突变的甲状腺癌对MEK抑制剂优先敏感,而具有其他MEK-ERK效应通路基因突变的肿瘤反应各异,这可能是因为它们仅部分依赖于ERK和/或因为反馈反应导致对MEK抑制产生部分难治性。