Division of Endocrine Neoplasia and Hormonal Disorders, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Thyroid. 2022 Oct;32(10):1184-1192. doi: 10.1089/thy.2022.0115. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
Oncogenic BRAF mutations are commonly found in advanced differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), and reports have shown efficacy of BRAF inhibitors in these tumors. We investigated the difference in response between dabrafenib monotherapy and dabrafenib + trametinib therapy in patients with BRAF-mutated radioactive iodine refractory DTC. In this open-label randomized phase 2 multicenter trial, patients aged ≥18 years with BRAF-mutated radioactive iodine refractory DTC with progressive disease by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 within 13 months before enrollment were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned to receive dabrafenib alone or dabrafenib + trametinib. The primary endpoint was objective response rate by modified RECIST (minor response of -20% to -29%, partial and complete response) within the first 24 weeks of therapy. Trial Registration Number: NCT01723202. A total of 53 patients were enrolled. The objective response rate (modified RECIST) was 42% (11/26 [95% confidence interval {CI} 23-63%]) with dabrafenib versus 48% (13/27 [CI 29-68%]) with dabrafenib + trametinib ( = 0.67). Objective response rate (RECIST 1.1) was 35% (9/26 [CI 17-56%]) with dabrafenib and 30% (8/27 [CI 14-51%]) with dabrafenib + trametinib. Most common treatment-related adverse events included skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (17/26, 65%), fever (13/26, 50%), hyperglycemia (12/26, 46%) with dabrafenib alone and fever (16/27, 59%), nausea, chills, fatigue (14/27, 52% each) with dabrafenib + trametinib. There were no treatment-related deaths. Combination dabrafenib + trametinib was not superior in efficacy compared to dabrafenib monotherapy in patients with BRAF-mutated radioiodine refractory progressive DTC.
致癌 BRAF 突变常见于晚期分化型甲状腺癌 (DTC),有报道显示 BRAF 抑制剂对此类肿瘤有效。我们研究了达拉非尼单药治疗与达拉非尼联合曲美替尼治疗 BRAF 突变型放射性碘难治性 DTC 患者的疗效差异。在这项开放标签、随机、2 期多中心试验中,入组患者为年龄≥18 岁的 BRAF 突变型放射性碘难治性 DTC 患者,在入组前 13 个月内根据实体瘤反应评估标准 1.1 (RECIST) 评估疾病进展,且对放射性碘治疗无反应。患者被随机分配接受达拉非尼单药或达拉非尼联合曲美替尼治疗。主要终点为治疗的前 24 周内根据改良 RECIST(次要缓解为 -20%至-29%,部分和完全缓解)评估的客观缓解率。试验注册号:NCT01723202。共纳入 53 例患者。达拉非尼组的客观缓解率(改良 RECIST)为 42%(11/26 [95%置信区间 {CI} 23-63%]),达拉非尼联合曲美替尼组为 48%(13/27 [CI 29-68%])(=0.67)。达拉非尼组的客观缓解率(RECIST 1.1)为 35%(9/26 [CI 17-56%]),达拉非尼联合曲美替尼组为 30%(8/27 [CI 14-51%])。最常见的治疗相关不良事件包括皮肤和皮下组织疾病(17/26,65%)、发热(13/26,50%)、高血糖(12/26,46%),达拉非尼单药治疗时为发热(16/27,59%)、恶心、寒战、疲劳(14/27,52%),达拉非尼联合曲美替尼治疗时为发热。无治疗相关死亡事件。达拉非尼联合曲美替尼治疗与达拉非尼单药治疗相比,在治疗 BRAF 突变型放射性碘难治性进展性 DTC 患者时,疗效无优势。