• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项比较两种窝沟封闭剂留存率的两年期临床试验。

A two-year clinical trial comparing the retention of two fissure sealants.

作者信息

Raadal M, Utkilen A B, Nilsen O L

机构信息

Department of Pedodontics, University of Bergen.

出版信息

Int J Paediatr Dent. 1991 Aug;1(2):77-81.

PMID:1838281
Abstract

A clinical evaluation of an experimental resin sealant (ICI 209085) was made by comparing it with a previously investigated and well recognized material (Light Cured Tinted Delton). The two materials were bilaterally placed in 117 pairs of teeth (48 premolars and 69 molars) in 60 children aged 6-14 years. The children were re-examined after 6, 12 and 24 months. The overall rates of full retention were 97.4% in teeth sealed with the experimental sealant and 96.6% in those sealed with the control sealant, while the corresponding figures for partial retention were 2.6% and 3.4%. From none of the teeth were the sealants totally lost. No carious lesions developed in the sealed fissures during the trial. It is concluded that the experimental sealant is comparable with the control sealant with respect to retention and caries prevention.

摘要

通过将一种实验性树脂封闭剂(ICI 209085)与一种先前已研究且广为人知的材料(光固化彩色德尔顿)进行比较,对该实验性树脂封闭剂进行了临床评估。这两种材料双侧放置在60名6至14岁儿童的117对牙齿(48颗前磨牙和69颗磨牙)中。在6个月、12个月和24个月后对这些儿童进行了复查。用实验性封闭剂封闭的牙齿的完全保留总体率为97.4%,用对照封闭剂封闭的牙齿的相应总体率为96.6%,而部分保留的相应数字分别为2.6%和3.4%。没有一颗牙齿的封闭剂完全脱落。在试验期间,封闭裂隙中未出现龋损。得出的结论是,在保留率和预防龋齿方面,实验性封闭剂与对照封闭剂相当。

相似文献

1
A two-year clinical trial comparing the retention of two fissure sealants.一项比较两种窝沟封闭剂留存率的两年期临床试验。
Int J Paediatr Dent. 1991 Aug;1(2):77-81.
2
Fissure sealant in permanent first molars after 10 years.10年后恒牙第一磨牙中的窝沟封闭剂。
Swed Dent J. 1988;12(5):181-5.
3
A comparison of Fluroshield with Delton fissure sealant: four year results.
Pediatr Dent. 1999 Nov-Dec;21(7):429-31.
4
2-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer sealant.
Am J Dent. 1999 Apr;12(2):59-61.
5
Retention of a glass ionomer cement and a resin-based fissure sealant and effect on carious outcome after 7 years.玻璃离子水门汀和树脂类窝沟封闭剂的保留情况及7年后对龋病转归的影响
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1998 Feb;26(1):21-5.
6
Clinical evaluation of a medium-filled flowable restorative material as a pit and fissure sealant.一种中等填充可流动修复材料作为窝沟封闭剂的临床评价。
Oper Dent. 2002 Jul-Aug;27(4):325-9.
7
A field trial of resin-based and glass-ionomer fissure sealants: clinical and radiographic assessment of caries.树脂基和玻璃离子窝沟封闭剂的现场试验:龋病的临床和影像学评估
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2006 Feb;34(1):36-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2006.00248.x.
8
Retention of three fissure sealants and a dentin bonding system used as fissure sealant in caries prevention: 12-month follow-up results.三种窝沟封闭剂及一种用作窝沟封闭剂的牙本质粘结系统在预防龋齿中的保留情况:12个月随访结果
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2007 Oct 1;12(6):E459-63.
9
Fissure sealing with a light-cured resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cement (Vitrebond) compared with a resin sealant.使用光固化树脂增强玻璃离子水门汀(Vitrebond)与树脂封闭剂进行窝沟封闭的比较。
Int J Paediatr Dent. 1996 Dec;6(4):235-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263x.1996.tb00251.x.
10
Randomized, controlled trial comparing the retention of a flowable restorative system with a conventional resin sealant: one-year follow up.比较可流动修复系统与传统树脂封闭剂留存率的随机对照试验:一年随访
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2005 Jan;15(1):44-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2005.00605.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Retention of a Flowable Composite Resin in Comparison to a Conventional Resin-Based Sealant: One-year Follow-up.可流动复合树脂与传统树脂基窝沟封闭剂的保留情况:一年随访
J Dent (Tehran). 2010 Winter;7(1):1-5. Epub 2010 Mar 31.