• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

可流动复合树脂与传统树脂基窝沟封闭剂的保留情况:一年随访

Retention of a Flowable Composite Resin in Comparison to a Conventional Resin-Based Sealant: One-year Follow-up.

作者信息

Jafarzadeh M, Malekafzali B, Tadayon N, Fallahi S

机构信息

Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

出版信息

J Dent (Tehran). 2010 Winter;7(1):1-5. Epub 2010 Mar 31.

PMID:21998768
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3184721/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Long-term retention of pit and fissure sealants is crucial for their success. This clinical study evaluated the retention rate of a flowable composite resin (Filtek Supreme XT Flowable Restorative) compared to a conventional resin-based sealant (Concise Light Cure White Sealant) over 12 months.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty subjects aged 6 to 9 years were included in the study. Using a half-mouth design, a total of 80 first permanent molars were sealed with conventional fissure sealant on one side of the mouth and flowable composite on the contralateral side. Clinical evaluation was performed at 3, 6, and 12 months by a single blind examiner and the retention was classified as complete retention, partial loss, or total loss.

RESULTS

For both materials, there was no total loss of sealants over 12 months. Partial loss of both materials was observed in one sealant after 3 months. After 6 months, 36 teeth sealed with conventional fissure sealant were intact compared with 37 sealed with a flowable composite, and after 12 months, 33 teeth sealed with conventional fissure sealant were intact compared with 35 that were sealed with a flowable composite. There were no statistically significant difference (P>0.05) between the two materials regarding the retention rate at each follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

As flowable composite resulted in comparable sealant retention rates, this material could be a good choice for fissure sealant.

摘要

目的

窝沟封闭剂的长期留存率对其成功应用至关重要。本临床研究评估了一种可流动复合树脂(Filtek Supreme XT可流动修复材料)与传统树脂基封闭剂(Concise光固化白色封闭剂)在12个月内的留存率。

材料与方法

40名6至9岁的受试者纳入本研究。采用半口设计,共80颗第一恒磨牙,一侧牙用传统窝沟封闭剂封闭,对侧牙用可流动复合树脂封闭。由一名单盲检查者在3个月、6个月和12个月时进行临床评估,留存情况分为完全留存、部分脱落或完全脱落。

结果

两种材料在12个月内均无封闭剂完全脱落的情况。3个月后,有一颗封闭剂出现两种材料的部分脱落。6个月后,用传统窝沟封闭剂封闭的36颗牙完好,用可流动复合树脂封闭的为37颗;12个月后,用传统窝沟封闭剂封闭的33颗牙完好,用可流动复合树脂封闭的为35颗。两种材料在各随访期的留存率之间无统计学显著差异(P>0.05)。

结论

由于可流动复合树脂的封闭剂留存率相当,该材料可作为窝沟封闭剂的一个良好选择。

相似文献

1
Retention of a Flowable Composite Resin in Comparison to a Conventional Resin-Based Sealant: One-year Follow-up.可流动复合树脂与传统树脂基窝沟封闭剂的保留情况:一年随访
J Dent (Tehran). 2010 Winter;7(1):1-5. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
2
Randomized, controlled trial comparing the retention of a flowable restorative system with a conventional resin sealant: one-year follow up.比较可流动修复系统与传统树脂封闭剂留存率的随机对照试验:一年随访
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2005 Jan;15(1):44-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2005.00605.x.
3
Clinical Evaluation of the Retention of Self-adhering Flowable Composite as Fissure Sealant in 6-9-year-old Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial.6-9岁儿童中自粘性流动复合树脂作为窝沟封闭剂的保留情况的临床评估:一项随机对照试验
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022 May-Jun;15(3):322-326. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2382.
4
Clinical comparison of a flowable composite and fissure sealant: a 24-month split-mouth, randomized, and controlled study.一种流动复合树脂与窝沟封闭剂的临床比较:一项为期24个月的半口、随机对照研究。
J Dent. 2014 Feb;42(2):149-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.11.015. Epub 2013 Dec 1.
5
[Application of fluoride releasing flowable resin in pit and fissure sealant of children with early enamel caries].含氟可流动树脂在儿童早期釉质龋窝沟封闭中的应用
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2018 Oct 18;50(5):911-914.
6
Retention of pit and fissure sealant versus flowable composite: An one-year comparative evaluation.窝沟封闭剂与流动复合树脂的保留情况:一年期对比评估。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2019 Oct-Dec;37(4):372-377. doi: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_122_19.
7
Clinical evaluation of a medium-filled flowable restorative material as a pit and fissure sealant.一种中等填充可流动修复材料作为窝沟封闭剂的临床评价。
Oper Dent. 2002 Jul-Aug;27(4):325-9.
8
Comparison of the clinical performance of self-adhering flowable composite and resin-based pit and fissure sealant: a randomized clinical trial in pediatric patients.自黏流动复合树脂与树脂型窝沟封闭剂临床性能比较:儿科患者的随机临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Aug 14;24(1):943. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04449-6.
9
Evaluation of Different Fissure Sealant Materials and Flowable Composites Used as Pit-and-fissure Sealants: A 24-Month Clinical Trial.不同窝沟封闭剂材料及用作窝沟封闭剂的流动复合树脂的评估:一项24个月的临床试验
Pediatr Dent. 2015 Sep-Oct;37(5):468-73.
10
Retention of flowable composite resins in comparison to pit and fissure sealants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.可流动复合树脂与窝沟封闭剂的保留情况:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gen Dent. 2020 Jul-Aug;68(4):50-55.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the clinical performance of self-adhering flowable composite and resin-based pit and fissure sealant: a randomized clinical trial in pediatric patients.自黏流动复合树脂与树脂型窝沟封闭剂临床性能比较:儿科患者的随机临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Aug 14;24(1):943. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04449-6.
2
Comparison of Retention between Conventional and Nanofilled Resin Sealants in a Paediatric Population: A Randomized Clinical Trial.传统树脂封闭剂与纳米复合树脂封闭剂在儿童群体中保留率的比较:一项随机临床试验
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 8;11(12):3276. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123276.
3
Retention Ability of a Glass Carbomer Pit and Fissure Sealant.玻璃离聚物窝沟封闭剂的保留能力。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 10;19(4):1966. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19041966.
4
Retention of pit and fissure sealants versus flowable composites in permanent teeth: A systematic review.恒牙中窝沟封闭剂与流动复合树脂的保留情况:一项系统评价
Heliyon. 2020 Sep 24;6(9):e04964. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04964. eCollection 2020 Sep.
5
Influences of Successive Exposure to Bleaching and Fluoride Preparations on the Surface Hardness and Roughness of the Aged Resin Composite Restoratives.连续暴露于漂白剂和氟化物制剂对老年树脂复合材料修复体表面硬度和粗糙度的影响。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Sep 16;56(9):476. doi: 10.3390/medicina56090476.
6
Quality of research: Improper evaluation of the quality of trials of retention rates.研究质量:对保留率试验质量的评估不当。
Br Dent J. 2019 Jan 25;226(2):84-85. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2019.54.
7
Flowable composite as fissure sealing material? A systematic review and meta-analysis.可流动复合树脂作为窝沟封闭材料?一项系统评价与Meta分析。
Br Dent J. 2018 Jan 26;224(2):92-97. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.40.
8
Flowable Resin Composites: A Systematic Review and Clinical Considerations.可流动树脂复合材料:系统评价与临床考量
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Jun;9(6):ZE18-24. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/12294.6129. Epub 2015 Jun 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Preventing dental caries through school-based sealant programs: updated recommendations and reviews of evidence.通过学校窝沟封闭项目预防龋齿:更新的建议和证据回顾。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2009 Nov;140(11):1356-65. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0070.
2
Pit and fissure sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents.用于预防儿童和青少年恒牙龋齿的窝沟封闭剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8(4):CD001830. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001830.pub3.
3
Retention and penetration of a conventional resin-based sealant and a photochromatic flowable composite resin placed on occlusal pits and fissures.放置于咬合面窝沟处的传统树脂基封闭剂和光致变色可流动复合树脂的保留率和渗透情况。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2007 Oct-Dec;25(4):169-73. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.37012.
4
Randomized, controlled trial comparing the retention of a flowable restorative system with a conventional resin sealant: one-year follow up.比较可流动修复系统与传统树脂封闭剂留存率的随机对照试验:一年随访
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2005 Jan;15(1):44-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2005.00605.x.
5
Penetration and microleakage of dental sealants in artificial fissures.牙科封闭剂在人工裂隙中的渗透与微渗漏
J Dent Child (Chic). 2004 Jan-Apr;71(1):41-4.
6
Caries-preventive effect of fissure sealants: a systematic review.窝沟封闭剂的防龋效果:一项系统评价
Acta Odontol Scand. 2003 Dec;61(6):321-30. doi: 10.1080/00016350310007581.
7
Updated comparison of the caries susceptibility of various morphological types of permanent teeth.恒牙不同形态类型龋齿易感性的最新比较。
J Public Health Dent. 2003 Summer;63(3):174-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2003.tb03496.x.
8
In vitro study of penetration of flowable resin composite and compomer into occlusal fissures.
Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2002 Dec;3(4):205-9.
9
Pit and fissure sealant: review of the literature.窝沟封闭剂:文献综述
Pediatr Dent. 2002 Sep-Oct;24(5):393-414.
10
Clinical evaluation of a medium-filled flowable restorative material as a pit and fissure sealant.一种中等填充可流动修复材料作为窝沟封闭剂的临床评价。
Oper Dent. 2002 Jul-Aug;27(4):325-9.