Korner-Bitensky Nicol, Desrosiers Johanne, Rochette Annie
Faculty of Medicine, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
J Rehabil Med. 2008 Apr;40(4):291-7. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0167.
First, to identify occupational therapists' stroke rehabilitation practices related to leisure and social aspects of participation and potential explanatory variables associated with these practices. Secondly, to identify occupational therapists' desired assessment and treatment practices related to participation.
A Canada-wide telephone survey.
A random sample of 480 occupational therapists providing stroke rehabilitation.
Two case studies were created: one representing a patient receiving inpatient stroke rehabilitation; the other receiving community-based rehabilitation. A standardized questionnaire was used to elicit information on: (i) clinician and environmental variables; (ii) management of the patient depicted; (iii) desired assessment and intervention use.
60.2% identified a problem relating to leisure or social aspects of participation, 23.1% would use an assessment and 36.5% would offer an intervention focusing on leisure or social participation. Desired assessment use was low (1%), as was desired intervention use (15.2%). Regression analyses using numerous potential explanatory variables explained little regarding clinician practices.
Less than half of the occupational therapists focused interventions on leisure and social aspects of participation, suggesting a gap between what could be done to enhance successful community reintegration post-stroke and what is currently done.
第一,确定职业治疗师与参与的休闲和社会方面相关的中风康复实践,以及与这些实践相关的潜在解释变量。第二,确定职业治疗师在参与方面期望的评估和治疗实践。
一项全加拿大范围的电话调查。
480名提供中风康复服务的职业治疗师的随机样本。
创建了两个案例研究:一个代表接受住院中风康复的患者;另一个接受社区康复。使用标准化问卷来获取以下方面的信息:(i)临床医生和环境变量;(ii)所描述患者的管理;(iii)期望的评估和干预使用情况。
60.2%的人指出了与参与的休闲或社会方面相关的问题,23.1%的人会使用评估,36.5%的人会提供专注于休闲或社会参与的干预。期望的评估使用率较低(1%),期望的干预使用率也较低(15.2%)。使用众多潜在解释变量的回归分析对临床医生的实践解释甚少。
不到一半的职业治疗师将干预重点放在参与的休闲和社会方面,这表明在中风后增强成功重返社区方面可以做的事情与目前所做的事情之间存在差距。