Capellini Isabella, Barton Robert A, McNamara Patrick, Preston Brian T, Nunn Charles L
Evolutionary Anthropology Research Group, Department of Anthropology, Durham University, DH1 3HN Durham, United Kingdom.
E-mail:
Evolution. 2008 Jul;62(7):1764-1776. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00392.x.
The amount of time asleep varies greatly in mammals, from 3 h in the donkey to 20 h in the armadillo. Previous comparative studies have suggested several functional explanations for interspecific variation in both the total time spent asleep and in rapid-eye movement (REM) or "quiet" (non-REM) sleep. In support of specific functional benefits of sleep, these studies reported correlations between time in specific sleep states (NREM or REM) and brain size, metabolic rate, and developmental variables. Here we show that estimates of sleep duration are significantly influenced by the laboratory conditions under which data are collected and that, when analyses are limited to data collected under more standardized procedures, traditional functional explanations for interspecific variation in sleep durations are no longer supported. Specifically, we find that basal metabolic rate correlates negatively rather than positively with sleep quotas, and that neither adult nor neonatal brain mass correlates positively with REM or NREM sleep times. These results contradict hypotheses that invoke energy conservation, cognition, and development as drivers of sleep variation. Instead, the negative correlations of both sleep states with basal metabolic rate and diet are consistent with trade-offs between sleep and foraging time. In terms of predation risk, both REM and NREM sleep quotas are reduced when animals sleep in more exposed sites, whereas species that sleep socially sleep less. Together with the fact that REM and NREM sleep quotas correlate strongly with each other, these results suggest that variation in sleep primarily reflects ecological constraints acting on total sleep time, rather than the independent responses of each sleep state to specific selection pressures. We propose that, within this ecological framework, interspecific variation in sleep duration might be compensated by variation in the physiological intensity of sleep.
哺乳动物的睡眠时间差异很大,从驴的3小时到犰狳的20小时不等。先前的比较研究对总睡眠时间以及快速眼动(REM)或“安静”(非REM)睡眠的种间差异提出了几种功能性解释。为了支持睡眠的特定功能益处,这些研究报告了特定睡眠状态(非REM或REM)的时间与脑容量、代谢率和发育变量之间的相关性。在这里,我们表明睡眠时间的估计值受到数据收集的实验室条件的显著影响,并且当分析仅限于在更标准化程序下收集的数据时,传统的关于睡眠时间种间差异的功能性解释不再成立。具体而言,我们发现基础代谢率与睡眠配额呈负相关而非正相关,并且无论是成年动物还是新生动物的脑质量与REM或非REM睡眠时间均无正相关。这些结果与将能量守恒、认知和发育作为睡眠变化驱动因素的假设相矛盾。相反,两种睡眠状态与基础代谢率和饮食之间的负相关与睡眠和觅食时间之间的权衡是一致的。就捕食风险而言,当动物在更暴露的地点睡眠时,REM和非REM睡眠配额都会减少,而群居睡眠的物种睡眠时间较短。再加上REM和非REM睡眠配额之间相互强烈关联这一事实,这些结果表明睡眠变化主要反映了作用于总睡眠时间的生态限制,而不是每种睡眠状态对特定选择压力的独立反应。我们提出,在这个生态框架内,睡眠时间的种间差异可能通过睡眠生理强度的差异来补偿。