Papaparaskevas Joseph, Pantazatou Angeliki, Katsandri Anastasia, Houhoula Dimitra P, Legakis Nicholas J, Tsakris Athanassios, Avlamis Athina
Department of Microbiology, Medical School, University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008 Jul;62(1):137-41. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkn134. Epub 2008 Apr 1.
Moxifloxacin is recommended in the empirical treatment of infections involving Gram-negative anaerobes. However, current European data regarding its activity against anaerobic pathogens are limited. In order to evaluate its potency, we comparatively studied the activity of moxifloxacin against recently isolated Gram-negative anaerobes.
Four hundred and ninety-five Gram-negative anaerobic clinical isolates (296 Bacteroides fragilis group, 58 non-fragilis Bacteroides spp. and 141 Prevotella spp.) were prospectively recovered in six Greek hospitals. Moxifloxacin MICs were determined in comparison with those of penicillin, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefoxitin, imipenem, metronidazole and clindamycin.
Overall moxifloxacin MIC(50) and MIC(90) were 2 and 32 mg/L, respectively. Based on the current CLSI breakpoints (susceptible, < or =2 mg/L; resistant, > or =8 mg/L), almost half of the total isolates (49%) were non-susceptible to moxifloxacin (32% resistant; 17% intermediate). This was more evident among the non-fragilis Bacteroides species, where 47% of the isolates were resistant and 14% intermediate to moxifloxacin. Species variation was noticed, with the highest non-susceptible rates detected among Prevotella oralis (90%), Prevotella bivia (80%), Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron (75%), Bacteroides uniformis (70%) and Bacteroides capillosus (67%) species. Among the 19 (4%) isolates that were metronidazole non-susceptible (MIC > or = 16 mg/L), only 4 (21%) were additionally non-susceptible to moxifloxacin.
High resistance rates to moxifloxacin among Bacteroides and Prevotella spp. were recorded, exceeding those previously reported in Europe and contraindicating its use as monotherapy for infections involving Gram-negative anaerobes without prior microbiological confirmation. For empirical usage, moxifloxacin should be combined with metronidazole in order to cover for these pathogens.
莫西沙星被推荐用于革兰氏阴性厌氧菌感染的经验性治疗。然而,目前欧洲有关其对厌氧性病原体活性的数据有限。为了评估其效力,我们比较研究了莫西沙星对近期分离出的革兰氏阴性厌氧菌的活性。
在希腊的六家医院前瞻性收集了495株革兰氏阴性厌氧临床分离株(296株脆弱拟杆菌属、58株非脆弱拟杆菌属和141株普雷沃菌属)。将莫西沙星的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)与青霉素、哌拉西林/他唑巴坦、头孢西丁、亚胺培南、甲硝唑和克林霉素的MIC进行比较测定。
总体而言,莫西沙星的MIC50和MIC90分别为2mg/L和32mg/L。根据当前美国临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)的断点值(敏感,≤2mg/L;耐药,≥8mg/L),几乎一半的分离株(49%)对莫西沙星不敏感(32%耐药;17%中介)。这在非脆弱拟杆菌属中更为明显,其中47%的分离株对莫西沙星耐药,14%为中介。观察到种属差异,在口腔普雷沃菌(90%)、二路普雷沃菌(80%)、多形拟杆菌(75%)、单形拟杆菌(70%)和毛细拟杆菌(67%)种属中检测到最高的不敏感率。在19株(4%)对甲硝唑不敏感(MIC≥16mg/L)的分离株中,只有4株(21%)对莫西沙星也不敏感。
记录到拟杆菌属和普雷沃菌属中对莫西沙星的高耐药率,超过了欧洲先前报道的耐药率,这表明在没有事先微生物学确认的情况下,莫西沙星不宜作为革兰氏阴性厌氧菌感染的单一疗法使用。对于经验性用药,莫西沙星应与甲硝唑联合使用,以覆盖这些病原体。