Marmery Helen, Shanmuganathan Kathirkamanathan, Mirvis Stuart E, Richard Howard, Sliker Clint, Miller Lisa A, Haan James M, Witlus David, Scalea Thomas M
Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Windmill Road, Oxford, UK.
J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Apr;206(4):685-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.11.024. Epub 2008 Feb 11.
To determine the accuracy of contrast-enhanced multidetector CT (MDCT) in demonstrating splenic vascular injury based on results of splenic angiography and operation.
This institutional review board-approved study included 392 hemodynamically stable blunt trauma patients whose admission MDCTs demonstrated splenic injury. Images were assessed for parenchymal injury grade, hemoperitoneum volume, and evidence of bleeding and nonbleeding splenic vascular injury. Splenic arteriography was performed for high splenic injury grade and splenic vascular injury. Medical records were reviewed to determine arteriographic interpretation, surgery indications and findings, outcomes, and demographics. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and accuracy of MDCT in detecting vascular injury were calculated based on results of arteriography and operation.
Splenic vascular injury was seen in 22% of patients (86 of 392) on MDCT. Presence of a vascular injury correlated with the CT-based parenchymal splenic injury grade (p < 0.0001). Active splenic bleeding was associated with subsequent clinical deterioration (p < 0.0001). Overall, MDCT had a sensitivity of 76% (76 of 100); specificity of 90% (95 of 106); negative and positive predictive values of 80% (95 of 119) and 87% (76 of 87), respectively; and accuracy of 83% (171 of 206) in detecting vascular injury compared with reference standards. The success rate of nonoperative management was 96%.
MDCT provides valuable information to direct initial clinical management of patients with blunt splenic trauma by demonstrating both active bleeding and nonbleeding vascular injuries. Not all vascular injuries are detected on MDCT, and splenic angiography is still indicated for high-grade parenchymal injury.
基于脾血管造影和手术结果,确定对比增强多层螺旋CT(MDCT)在显示脾血管损伤方面的准确性。
这项经机构审查委员会批准的研究纳入了392例血流动力学稳定的钝性创伤患者,其入院时的MDCT显示有脾损伤。对图像进行实质损伤分级、腹腔积血体积以及脾出血性和非出血性血管损伤证据的评估。对脾损伤分级高和存在脾血管损伤的患者进行脾动脉造影。查阅病历以确定动脉造影解读、手术指征和发现、结局及人口统计学资料。根据动脉造影和手术结果计算MDCT检测血管损伤的敏感性、特异性、预测值和准确性。
MDCT显示22%的患者(392例中的86例)存在脾血管损伤。血管损伤的存在与基于CT的脾实质损伤分级相关(p<0.0001)。脾活动性出血与随后的临床病情恶化相关(p<0.0001)。总体而言,与参考标准相比,MDCT检测血管损伤的敏感性为76%(100例中的76例);特异性为90%(106例中的95例);阴性和阳性预测值分别为80%(119例中的95例)和87%(87例中的76例);准确性为83%(206例中的171例)。非手术治疗的成功率为96%。
MDCT通过显示活动性出血和非出血性血管损伤,为钝性脾外伤患者的初始临床管理提供有价值的信息。并非所有血管损伤都能在MDCT上被检测到,对于高级别实质损伤仍需进行脾血管造影。