From the Departments of Radiology (J.T.L.) and Biostatistics (E.S., A.D.), University of Kentucky, 800 Rose St, Room HX 315A, Lexington, KY 40536-0293; Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (J.U.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Ind (S.D.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (S.T.C.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (R.T., D.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (K.F.L.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston, Houston, Tex (N.R.C.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Md (M.P.D.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (Arthur Baghdanian, Armonde Baghdanian); Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio (C.F.); Department of Radiology, Boston University, Boston, Mass (C.A.L.).
Radiology. 2021 Apr;299(1):122-130. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021202917. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
Background Treatment of blunt splenic trauma (BST) continues to evolve with improved imaging for detection of splenic vascular injuries. Purpose To report on treatments for BST from 11 trauma centers, the frequency and clinical impact of splenic vascular injuries, and factors influencing treatment. Materials and Methods Patients were retrospectively identified as having BST between January 2011 and December 2018, and clinical, imaging, and outcome data were recorded. Patient data were summarized descriptively, both overall and stratified by initial treatment received (nonoperative management [NOM], angiography, or surgery). Regression analyses were used to examine the primary outcomes of interest, which were initial treatment received and length of stay (LOS). Results This study evaluated 1373 patients (mean age, 42 years ± 18; 845 men). Initial treatments included NOM in 849 patients, interventional radiology (IR) in 240 patients, and surgery in 284 patients. Rates from CT reporting were 22% (304 of 1373) for active splenic hemorrhage (ASH) and 20% (276 of 1373) for contained vascular injury (CVI). IR management of high-grade injuries increased 15.6%, from 28.6% (eight of 28) to 44.2% (57 of 129) (2011-2012 vs 2017-2018). Patients who were treated invasively had a higher injury severity score (odds ratio [OR], 1.04; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.05; < .001), lower temperature (OR, 0.97; 95% CI: 0.97, 1.00; = .03), and a lower hematocrit (OR, 0.96; 95% CI: 0.93, 0.99; = .003) and were more likely to show ASH (OR, 8.05; 95% CI: 5.35, 12.26; < .001) or CVI (OR, 2.70; 95% CI: 1.64, 4.44; < .001) on CT images, have spleen-only injures (OR, 2.35; 95% CI: 1.45, 3.8; < .001), and have been administered blood product for fewer than 24 hours (OR, 2.35; 95% CI: 1.58, 3.51; < .001) compared with those chosen for NOM, after adjusting for key demographic and clinical variables. After adjustment, factors associated with a shorter LOS were female sex (OR, 0.84; 95% CI: 0.73, 0.96; = .009), spleen-only injury (OR, 0.72; 95% CI: 0.6, 0.86; < .001), higher admission hematocrit (OR, 0.98; 95% CI: 0.6, 0.86; < .001), and presence of ASH at CT (OR, 0.74; 95% CI: 0.62, 0.88; < .001). Conclusion Contained vascular injury and active splenic hemorrhage (ASH) were frequently reported, and rates of interventional radiologic management increased during the study period. ASH was associated with a shorter length of stay, and patients with ASH had eight times the odds of undergoing invasive treatment compared with undergoing nonoperative management. © RSNA, 2021 See also the editorial by Patlas in this issue.
背景 随着用于检测脾血管损伤的影像学检查方法的改进,钝性脾外伤(BST)的治疗方法也在不断发展。目的 报告 11 家创伤中心的 BST 治疗情况,脾血管损伤的频率和临床影响,以及影响治疗的因素。材料与方法 回顾性分析 2011 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间诊断为 BST 的患者,记录其临床、影像学和转归数据。采用描述性统计方法对患者数据进行总结,总体和按初始治疗方法(非手术治疗[NOM]、血管造影或手术)进行分层。采用回归分析来检验主要观察结果,即初始治疗方法和住院时间(LOS)。结果 本研究共纳入 1373 例患者(平均年龄,42 岁±18 岁;845 例男性)。初始治疗包括 NOM 849 例,介入放射学(IR)240 例,手术 284 例。CT 报告脾实质出血(active splenic hemorrhage,ASH)的比例为 22%(304/1373),有包膜血管损伤(contained vascular injury,CVI)的比例为 20%(276/1373)。高级别损伤的 IR 治疗比例增加了 15.6%,从 2011-2012 年的 28.6%(8/28)增至 2017-2018 年的 44.2%(57/129)(2011-2012 年 vs 2017-2018 年)。接受有创治疗的患者损伤严重程度评分更高(优势比[OR],1.04;95%CI:1.02,1.05;<.001),体温更低(OR,0.97;95%CI:0.97,1.00;=.03),血细胞比容更低(OR,0.96;95%CI:0.93,0.99;=.003),更可能出现 ASH(OR,8.05;95%CI:5.35,12.26;<.001)或 CVI(OR,2.70;95%CI:1.64,4.44;<.001),单纯脾损伤(OR,2.35;95%CI:1.45,3.8;<.001)的发生率更高,以及在接受 NOM 治疗前接受血液制品治疗的时间少于 24 小时(OR,2.35;95%CI:1.58,3.51;<.001),这些与接受 NOM 治疗的患者相比,在调整了关键的人口统计学和临床变量后差异均有统计学意义。调整后,女性(OR,0.84;95%CI:0.73,0.96;=.009)、单纯脾损伤(OR,0.72;95%CI:0.6,0.86;<.001)、入院时血细胞比容较高(OR,0.98;95%CI:0.6,0.86;<.001)以及 CT 上存在 ASH(OR,0.74;95%CI:0.62,0.88;<.001)与 LOS 较短相关。结论 本研究报告了常见的包膜血管损伤和 ASH,在此期间,IR 治疗的比例增加。ASH 与 LOS 较短相关,与接受 NOM 治疗相比,ASH 患者接受有创治疗的可能性高 8 倍。©RSNA,2021 本刊同期还发表了 Patlas 的述评文章。