Acs Ferenc, Greenlee Mark W
University of Regensburg, Germany.
Neuroimage. 2008 Jun;41(2):380-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.02.007. Epub 2008 Feb 20.
The brain regions for pursuit and saccadic eye movement processing are well known. There is, however, little knowledge about the interaction between these areas during voluntary eye movements. With 8 subjects, we investigated the dynamics of cortical areas involved in control of saccadic and smooth pursuit eye movements. We explored the connectivity between V1, hMT+, and LIP. Additionally, we explored the effects caused by shifting covert attention between pursuit and saccade targets. We modeled 15 plausible models, selecting the best one using a new group comparison approach for DCM models. Effective connectivity from V1 to hMT+ was shown to depend on whether subjects attended covertly or overtly to the targets. Comparing active tracking tasks resulted in effects in accordance with current theories of the eye movement processing system.
用于追踪和扫视眼动处理的脑区已为人熟知。然而,对于这些区域在随意眼动过程中的相互作用却知之甚少。我们以8名受试者为对象,研究了参与扫视和平滑追踪眼动控制的皮层区域的动态变化。我们探究了V1、hMT+和LIP之间的连接性。此外,我们还探究了在追踪目标和扫视目标之间转移隐蔽注意力所产生的影响。我们构建了15个似是而非的模型,并使用一种针对动态因果模型(DCM)的新的组间比较方法来选择最佳模型。结果显示,从V1到hMT+的有效连接取决于受试者是隐蔽还是公开地关注目标。比较主动追踪任务产生的效果与当前眼动处理系统理论相符。