Roberge Pasquale, Marchand André, Reinharz Daniel, Savard Pierre
Univérsité of Montréal, Québéc.
Behav Modif. 2008 May;32(3):333-51. doi: 10.1177/0145445507309025.
A randomized, controlled trial was conducted to examine the cost-effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT) for panic disorder with agoraphobia. A total of 100 participants were randomly assigned to standard (n = 33), group (n = 35), and brief (n = 32) treatment conditions. Results show significant clinical and statistical improvement on standard symptom measures and quality of life from baseline to posttreatment and 3-month follow-up, with no significant differences between treatment conditions. Compared with standard CBT, brief and group CBT incurred lower treatment costs and had a superior cost-effectiveness ratio, suggesting the potential of these alternative treatment conditions in increasing access to effective treatment.
开展了一项随机对照试验,以检验认知行为疗法(CBT)对伴有广场恐惧症的惊恐障碍的成本效益。总共100名参与者被随机分配到标准治疗组(n = 33)、团体治疗组(n = 35)和简短治疗组(n = 32)。结果显示,从基线到治疗后及3个月随访时,标准症状指标和生活质量有显著的临床和统计学改善,各治疗组之间无显著差异。与标准CBT相比,简短CBT和团体CBT的治疗成本更低,成本效益比更高,表明这些替代治疗方式在增加有效治疗可及性方面具有潜力。