Werner Helene, Molinari Luciano, Guyer Caroline, Jenni Oskar G
Child Development Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Steinwiesstrasse 75, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008 Apr;162(4):350-8. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.162.4.350.
To describe sleep-wake patterns in kindergarten children by measures derived from questionnaire, diary, and actigraphy and to report rates of agreement between methods according to Bland and Altman.
Cross-sectional study, data from 7 nights of actigraph recordings and sleep diary and from a questionnaire.
Children studied in their homes.
Fifty children, aged 4 to 7 years.
Sleep start, sleep end, assumed sleep, actual sleep time, and nocturnal wake time derived from different methods.
Differences between actigraphy and diary were +/- 28 minutes for sleep start, +/- 24 minutes for sleep end, and +/- 32 minutes for assumed sleep, indicating satisfactory agreement between methods, whereas for actual sleep time and nocturnal wake time, agreement rates were not sufficient (+/- 106 minutes and +/- 55 minutes, respectively). Agreement rates between actigraphy and questionnaire as well as between diary and questionnaire were insufficient for all variables. Sex and age of children and socioeconomic status did not influence the differences between methods for all variables.
Actigraphy and diary may be interchangeably used for the assessment of sleep start, sleep end, and assumed sleep but not for nocturnal wake times. The diary is a cost-effective and valid source of information about children's sleep-schedule times, while actigraphy may provide additional information about nocturnal wake times or may be used if parents are unable to report in detail. It is insufficient to collect information by a questionnaire or an interview asking about children's normal sleep patterns.
通过问卷、日记和活动记录仪得出的测量方法来描述幼儿园儿童的睡眠-觉醒模式,并根据布兰德和奥特曼方法报告各方法之间的一致性率。
横断面研究,来自7晚活动记录仪记录、睡眠日记和一份问卷的数据。
在儿童家中进行研究。
50名4至7岁的儿童。
从不同方法得出的入睡时间、睡眠结束时间、假定睡眠时间、实际睡眠时间和夜间觉醒时间。
活动记录仪与日记之间在入睡时间上的差异为±28分钟,睡眠结束时间上的差异为±24分钟,假定睡眠时间上的差异为±32分钟,表明各方法之间一致性良好,而对于实际睡眠时间和夜间觉醒时间,一致性率不足(分别为±106分钟和±55分钟)。活动记录仪与问卷之间以及日记与问卷之间在所有变量上的一致性率均不足。儿童的性别、年龄和社会经济地位并未影响所有变量各方法之间的差异。
活动记录仪和日记可交替用于评估入睡时间、睡眠结束时间和假定睡眠时间,但不适用于夜间觉醒时间。日记是关于儿童睡眠时间表的一种经济有效且有效的信息来源,而活动记录仪可能会提供有关夜间觉醒时间的额外信息,或者在家长无法详细报告时使用。通过询问儿童正常睡眠模式的问卷或访谈来收集信息是不够的。