Chin Kingsley R, Tomlinson Daniel T, Auerbach Joshua D, Shatsky Joshua B, Deirmengian Carl A
Spine Surgery Service, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Apr;21(2):139-44. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318093e5dc.
Prospective case controlled.
To determine the outcome after microdiscectomy in patients with disc herniation, concordant sciatica, and low-back pain with Modic I and II degenerative changes compared with similar patients without Modic changes.
The decision to perform a microdiscectomy versus a fusion or total disc replacement in a patient with a disc herniation and sciatica may be confounded by the presence of low-back pain, degenerative disc disease, and marrow and endplate (Modic) changes.
Thirty consecutive patients underwent a microdiscectomy by a single surgeon. Group 1 consisted of 15 patients, 6 men and 9 women, with a mean age of 36.7 years (range, 21 to 48 y), with Modic I and II changes. Group 2 contained 15 patients, 9 men and 6 women, with a mean age of 34.1 years (range, 20 to 68 y), without Modic changes. The average duration of low-back pain before surgery was 25.6 months (range 4 to 120 mo) in group 1 and 17.5 months (range 5 to 120 mo) in group 2. The visual analog scale (VAS) was used to grade low-back pain and the Oswestry score was used to grade overall disability.
There was no significant difference in preoperative sciatica, low-back pain, VAS or Oswestry scores for group 1 versus group 2 patients. Postoperatively, all patents had improved sciatica and resolution of any nerve tension sign. Eighty-six percent of patients in group 1 versus 93% of patients in group 2 had improvements in postoperative VAS score for low-back pain at 6 months. Average improvement within each group was 67% and 75%, respectively. VAS scores for low-back pain at 6 months improved from 6.9 to 2.3 (P=0.0005) in group 1 and 6.3 to 1.6 (P=0.0002) in group 2. Group 1 and 2 had 89% and 100% of patients show improvement in postoperative Oswestry score at 6 months with an average improvement of 58% and 84%, respectively. Oswestry scores at 6 months improved from 68.7% to 28.8% (P=0.0007) in group 1 and 61.2% to 9.9% (P=0.00003) in group 2.
There was a trend toward greater improvement in Oswestry scores in patients without Modic changes (P=0.09). Both groups reported statistically significant improvement in sciatica, low-back pain, and disability after microdiscectomy. Microdiscectomy was therefore an effective treatment for disc herniation and concordant sciatica despite low-back pain and Modic I and II degenerative changes.
Therapeutic II.
前瞻性病例对照研究。
确定与无Modic改变的类似患者相比,患有椎间盘突出症、一致性坐骨神经痛以及伴有Modic I和II型退变改变的下腰痛患者在接受显微椎间盘切除术之后的疗效。
对于患有椎间盘突出症和坐骨神经痛的患者,决定实施显微椎间盘切除术还是融合术或全椎间盘置换术,可能会因存在下腰痛、椎间盘退变疾病以及骨髓和终板(Modic)改变而受到干扰。
由一位外科医生连续为30例患者实施显微椎间盘切除术。第1组由15例患者组成,其中男性6例,女性9例,平均年龄36.7岁(范围21至48岁),伴有Modic I和II型改变。第2组包含15例患者,其中男性9例,女性6例,平均年龄34.1岁(范围20至68岁),无Modic改变。第1组术前下腰痛的平均持续时间为25.6个月(范围4至120个月),第2组为17.5个月(范围5至120个月)。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)对下腰痛进行评分,采用Oswestry评分对整体功能障碍进行评分。
第1组和第2组患者术前的坐骨神经痛、下腰痛、VAS评分或Oswestry评分无显著差异。术后,所有患者的坐骨神经痛均有改善,任何神经紧张体征均消失。第1组86%的患者与第2组93%的患者在术后6个月时VAS下腰痛评分有所改善。每组内的平均改善率分别为67%和75%。第1组术后6个月时VAS下腰痛评分从6.9改善至2.3(P = 0.0005),第2组从6.3改善至1.6(P = 0.0002)。第1组和第2组分别有89%和100%的患者在术后6个月时Oswestry评分有所改善,平均改善率分别为58%和84%。第1组术后6个月时Oswestry评分从68.7%改善至28.8%(P = 0.0007),第2组从61.2%改善至9.9%(P = 0.00003)。
无Modic改变的患者Oswestry评分有更大改善的趋势(P = 0.09)。两组患者均报告显微椎间盘切除术后坐骨神经痛、下腰痛和功能障碍有统计学意义的改善。因此,尽管存在下腰痛以及Modic I和II型退变改变,显微椎间盘切除术仍是治疗椎间盘突出症和一致性坐骨神经痛的有效方法。
治疗性II级。