Suppr超能文献

[伴有退变终板改变的腰椎间盘突出症手术方法的选择]

[Selection of surgical methods for lumbar disc herniation with degenerative endplates changes].

作者信息

Yang Yao-qi, Cao Peng, Pan Yu-tao, Liang Yu, Gong Yao-cheng, Zheng Tao, Zhang Xing-kai, Wu Wen-jian

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Affiliated Ruijin Hospital of Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200025, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2009 Jul 21;89(27):1902-6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the selection of surgical methods for lumbar disc herniation with low back and leg pain and degenerative lumbar Modic endplate changes and their different postoperative therapeutic effects.

METHODS

All 30 cases of single segment lumbar disc herniation accompanied by Modic endplate changes operated at our hospital using simple discectomy or decompressions with interbody fusion from January 2005 to January 2008 were retrospectively identified. There were 18 males and 12 females with an average age of 38.5 years old (26-53 years old) and an average follow-up of 21 months (4-40 months).

RESULTS

Discectomy alone group included 15 cases. The average score of Japanese Orthopedics Association (JOA) and visual analysis scale (VAS) of low back pain and lower extremity radicular pain at the preoperative and final follow-up time was 13.2 (5-17), 6.8 (4-10), 4.8 (1-8) and 19.8 (14 -24), 4.8 (2-10), 1.2 (0-6) respectively. The average improvement rate of JOA was 41.9%. The difference of VAS of lower extremity radicular pain between pre and post-operation was 3.7 on average. Among these 15 cases, Modic I, II and I/II mixed-type was 5, 9, and 1 respectively. Decompression with interbody fusion group included 15 cases. VAS of low back pain and lower extremity radicular pain at the preoperative and final follow-up time was 12.9 (5-17), 7.0 (4-10), 4.9 (1-8) and 22.6 (19-28), 2.8 (2-8) and 1.3 (0-6) respectively. The average improvement rate of JOA was 63.4%. The differences of VAS of lower extremity radicular pain and low back pain between pre and post-operation were 4.3 and 3.6 on average respectively. Among these cases, Modic I, II and I/II mixed-type was 6, 8, and 1 respectively. Comparing the VAS of low back pain, JOA average score and the improvement rate of JOA score of two groups at pre-operation and post-operation, statistical analysis showed that decompression with interbody fusion group was superior to simple discectomy group.

CONCLUSION

For lumbar disc herniation with degenerative Modic endplate changes, who suffered more from low back pain than lower extremity radicular pain, discectomy alone and decompression with interbody fusion could both improve the degree of lower extremity radicular pain, but discectomy alone is less likely to improve the degree of low back pain and function score than the latter. So the maneuver of lumbar decompression with fusion is a better choice.

摘要

目的

分析伴腰腿痛及腰椎Modic终板退变的腰椎间盘突出症手术方式的选择及其不同的术后治疗效果。

方法

回顾性分析2005年1月至2008年1月在我院行单纯椎间盘切除术或椎间融合减压术的30例单节段腰椎间盘突出症合并Modic终板改变的患者。其中男性18例,女性12例,平均年龄38.5岁(26 - 53岁),平均随访21个月(4 - 40个月)。

结果

单纯椎间盘切除术组15例。术前及末次随访时日本骨科学会(JOA)评分及腰背痛和下肢根性痛视觉分析量表(VAS)评分分别为13.2(5 - 17)、6.8(4 - 10)、4.8(1 - 8)和19.8(14 - 24)、4.8(2 - 10)、1.2(0 - 6)。JOA平均改善率为41.9%。下肢根性痛VAS术前术后平均差值为3.7。这15例中,Modic I型、II型及I/II混合型分别为5例、9例和1例。椎间融合减压术组15例。术前及末次随访时腰背痛和下肢根性痛VAS评分分别为12.9(5 - 17)、7.0(4 - 10)、4.9(1 - 8)和22.6(19 - 28)、2.8(2 - 8)、1.3(0 - 6)。JOA平均改善率为63.4%。下肢根性痛及腰背痛VAS术前术后平均差值分别为4.3和3.6。这些病例中,Modic I型、II型及I/II混合型分别为6例、8例和1例。比较两组术前及术后腰背痛VAS、JOA平均评分及JOA评分改善率,统计学分析显示椎间融合减压术组优于单纯椎间盘切除术组。

结论

对于伴有退行性Modic终板改变的腰椎间盘突出症患者,若腰背痛较下肢根性痛更明显,单纯椎间盘切除术和椎间融合减压术均可改善下肢根性痛程度,但单纯椎间盘切除术改善腰背痛程度及功能评分的效果不如后者。因此,腰椎融合减压手术是更好的选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验