Pokorny Paul H, Wiens Jonathan P, Litvak Harold
University of Detroit Mercy School of Dentistry, Detroit, MI, USA.
J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Apr;99(4):299-313. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60066-9.
This article addresses the historical perspective of the gnathological influence upon the concepts of occlusion for fixed prosthodontics. A critical assessment and subsequent scientific validation of occlusal theories require an understanding of their evolution in the formative years and the subsequent development of effective models for clinical practice. While gnathological concepts offer a structured methodology for prosthodontic procedures, further research is needed to corroborate current occlusal treatment approaches. This review focuses on the "classic" fixed prosthodontic literature and the currently available scientific literature involving fixed prosthodontic dentate occlusion and gnathology. A MEDLINE search was performed to identify English-language peer-reviewed publications spanning the last 56 years, along with an extensive hand search for years prior. Electronic searches of the literature were performed in MEDLINE using the key words: case series, clinical trials, cohort studies, fixed partial denture occlusion, dental occlusion, dental occlusion research, centric relation, incisal guidance, maximal intercuspation, occlusal vertical dimension, and occlusion, in various combinations to obtain potential references for review. A total of 10,382 English-language nonduplicate titles were obtained for 1950-2006 for the key words "dental occlusion." Other key word searches produced smaller numbers of articles, many of which were duplicates due to multiple searches and were subsequently eliminated. Manual hand searching of the MEDLINE reference list and other journals of interest was performed to identify any articles missed in the original search. Articles were included for review if they contained emerging occlusal theories, new technologies, or occlusal studies that included multiple subjects in contrast to case reports.
本文探讨了牙合学对固定修复学咬合概念的历史影响。对咬合理论进行批判性评估并随后进行科学验证,需要了解其在形成期的演变以及随后临床实践有效模型的发展。虽然牙合学概念为修复程序提供了一种结构化方法,但仍需要进一步研究来证实当前的咬合治疗方法。本综述聚焦于“经典”固定修复学文献以及目前可获得的涉及固定修复有牙颌咬合与牙合学的科学文献。通过医学文献数据库(MEDLINE)进行检索,以识别过去56年的英文同行评审出版物,并对之前年份进行广泛的手工检索。使用关键词“病例系列、临床试验、队列研究、固定局部义齿咬合、牙合、牙合研究、正中关系、切导、最大牙尖交错位、咬合垂直距离和咬合”的各种组合,在MEDLINE中对文献进行电子检索,以获取潜在的综述参考文献。对于关键词“牙合”,在1950 - 2006年共获得10382个英文非重复标题。其他关键词检索产生的文章数量较少,其中许多由于多次检索而重复,随后被剔除。对手工检索MEDLINE参考文献列表和其他相关期刊,以识别在原始检索中遗漏的任何文章。如果文章包含新出现的咬合理论、新技术或与病例报告不同的包含多个受试者的咬合研究,则纳入综述。