Lee Hwa Jung, Oh Kyung Chul
Department of Prosthodontics, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Dec 1;14(23):2713. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14232713.
With the advancement of digital technology, it has become possible to record jaw motion using intraoral scanners. However, there is a paucity of studies evaluating their accuracy. Twelve sets of scan data from 12 individuals were additively manufactured using a 3D printer and 3D-printable material. Each pair of scan data was mounted onto a semi-adjustable articulator. A blue articulating paper was inserted between the mounted models, and the pin of the articulator was moved to simulate motion (ART group). Subsequently, intraoral scan data were obtained, and the movements of the articulator were recorded. The trajectory expressed in the intraoral scanner software (TRIOS3; 3Shape A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark) appeared red on the monitor screen (IOS group). The blue and red areas in the ART and IOS groups, respectively, were measured in pixels for each tooth type, and the number of trajectories marked or expressed for each tooth type was counted. Regarding the areas of trajectory, significant differences were observed between the ART and IOS groups across all tooth types. Statistically significant differences were also noted in the number of trajectories for the first premolars and first molars between the two groups. Intraoral scanners may not accurately reproduce motion movements at the current level of technology. However, these results should be interpreted with caution because defining the trajectory accuracy between the two groups is challenging unless the (two) trajectories are exactly the same.
随着数字技术的进步,使用口腔内扫描仪记录下颌运动已成为可能。然而,评估其准确性的研究却很少。使用3D打印机和3D可打印材料对12名个体的12组扫描数据进行了增材制造。将每对扫描数据安装到半可调牙合架上。在安装好的模型之间插入蓝色咬合纸,并移动牙合架的销以模拟运动(ART组)。随后,获取口腔内扫描数据,并记录牙合架的运动。口腔内扫描仪软件(TRIOS3;3Shape A/S,哥本哈根,丹麦)中显示的轨迹在显示屏上呈红色(IOS组)。分别对ART组和IOS组中每种牙型的蓝色和红色区域以像素为单位进行测量,并计算每种牙型标记或显示的轨迹数量。关于轨迹面积,在所有牙型上ART组和IOS组之间均观察到显著差异。两组之间第一前磨牙和第一磨牙的轨迹数量也存在统计学上的显著差异。在当前技术水平下,口腔内扫描仪可能无法准确再现运动。然而,这些结果应谨慎解读,因为除非(两条)轨迹完全相同,否则定义两组之间的轨迹准确性具有挑战性。