Suppr超能文献

内镜下套扎术和内镜下金属钛夹置放术治疗马洛里-魏斯综合征并活动性出血患者

Endoscopic band ligation and endoscopic hemoclip placement for patients with Mallory-Weiss syndrome and active bleeding.

作者信息

Cho Young-Seok, Chae Hiun-Suk, Kim Hyung-Keun, Kim Jin-Soo, Kim Byung-Wook, Kim Sung-Soo, Han Sok-Won, Choi Kyu-Yong

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu 480-717, Korea.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2008 Apr 7;14(13):2080-4. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.2080.

Abstract

AIM

To compare the hemostatic efficacy and safety of two mechanical endoscopic methods: endoscopic band ligation (EBL) and endoscopic hemoclip placement (EHP) in patients with actively bleeding Mallory-Weiss syndrome (MWS).

METHODS

A prospective randomized study to compare the efficacy and safety of EHP with EBL was performed from January 2002 to August 2005. Forty-one patients with active bleeding from MWS were treated with EHP (n = 21) or EBL (n = 20).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between groups with respect to clinical and endoscopic characteristics. The mean number of hemoclips applied was 3.2 +/- 1.5 and the mean number of bands applied was 1.2 +/- 0.4. Primary hemostasis was achieved in all patients. Recurrent bleeding was observed in one patient from the EHP group and two from the EBL group. Patients with recurrent bleeding were treated by the same modality as at randomization and secondary hemostasis was achieved in all. There were no significant differences between the two groups in total transfusion amount or duration of hospital stay. No complications or bleeding-related death resulted.

CONCLUSION

EHP and EBL are equally effective and safe for the management of active bleeding in patients with Mallory-Weiss syndrome, even in those with shock or comorbid diseases.

摘要

目的

比较两种机械内镜治疗方法——内镜下套扎术(EBL)和内镜下金属钛夹止血术(EHP)对活动性出血的马洛里-魏斯综合征(MWS)患者的止血效果及安全性。

方法

2002年1月至2005年8月进行了一项前瞻性随机研究,比较EHP与EBL的疗效及安全性。41例MWS活动性出血患者接受了EHP治疗(n = 21)或EBL治疗(n = 20)。

结果

两组在临床和内镜特征方面无显著差异。应用金属钛夹的平均数量为3.2±1.5,应用套扎环的平均数量为1.2±0.4。所有患者均实现了初步止血。EHP组有1例患者、EBL组有2例患者出现再出血。出现再出血的患者采用随机分组时相同的方式进行治疗,所有患者均实现了二次止血。两组在总输血量或住院时间方面无显著差异。未出现并发症或与出血相关的死亡。

结论

EHP和EBL对于马洛里-魏斯综合征活动性出血患者的治疗同样有效且安全,即使是那些伴有休克或合并症的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验