Hendryx Michael
Institute for Health Policy Research, Department of Community Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
J Rural Health. 2008 Spring;24(2):179-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2008.00155.x.
Research on health disparities in Appalachia has rarely compared Appalachia to other geographic areas in such a way as to isolate possible Appalachian effects.
This study tests hypotheses that nonmetropolitan Appalachia will have higher levels of mental health professional shortage areas than other nonmetropolitan areas of the same states, but that these disparities will dissipate when accounting for social and economic differences.
The study analyzed secondary data for nonmetropolitan counties (N = 618) in the 13 Appalachian states. Appalachian counties were identified from the Appalachian Regional Commission designations. Mental health professional shortages were identified from Health Resources and Services Administration data. Area Resource File data were used to measure county-level income, education, uninsurance, unemployment, race/ethnicity percentages, and urban influence codes. Logistic regression models tested whether Appalachia was significantly associated with shortage areas, and whether the Appalachian effect persisted after accounting for social and economic covariates.
Seventy percent of Appalachian nonmetropolitan counties were mental health professional shortage areas, significantly higher than non-Appalachian, nonmetropolitan counties in the same states. The Appalachian effect did not persist after controlling for the full set of other variables; education and race/ethnicity emerged as significant predictors.
Appalachia location is associated with mental health professional shortages, but this effect is driven by underlying social differences, in particular by lower education. This method of identifying Appalachia for comparative purposes may be applied to many other health services research questions and to other defined geographic regions.
阿巴拉契亚地区健康差异的研究很少以能够分离出可能的阿巴拉契亚效应的方式将该地区与其他地理区域进行比较。
本研究检验以下假设:与同一州的其他非都市地区相比,非都市阿巴拉契亚地区的心理健康专业人员短缺地区水平更高,但在考虑社会和经济差异后,这些差异将消失。
该研究分析了13个阿巴拉契亚州非都市县(N = 618)的二手数据。阿巴拉契亚县是根据阿巴拉契亚区域委员会的指定确定的。心理健康专业人员短缺情况是根据卫生资源与服务管理局的数据确定的。区域资源文件数据用于衡量县级收入、教育程度、未参保率、失业率、种族/族裔百分比和城市影响代码。逻辑回归模型检验了阿巴拉契亚地区是否与短缺地区显著相关,以及在考虑社会和经济协变量后阿巴拉契亚效应是否持续存在。
70%的阿巴拉契亚非都市县是心理健康专业人员短缺地区,显著高于同一州的非阿巴拉契亚非都市县。在控制了所有其他变量后,阿巴拉契亚效应没有持续存在;教育程度和种族/族裔成为显著的预测因素。
阿巴拉契亚地区的位置与心理健康专业人员短缺有关,但这种效应是由潜在的社会差异驱动的,特别是受教育程度较低。这种为比较目的而确定阿巴拉契亚地区的方法可能适用于许多其他卫生服务研究问题以及其他定义的地理区域。