McNamara Michael J, Oser Carrie, Gohdes Dorothy, Fogle Crystelle C, Dietrich Dennis W, Burnett Anne, Okon Nicholas, Russell Joseph A, Detienne James, Harwell Todd S, Helgerson Steven D
Montana Cardiovascular Health Program, Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services, Helena, MT 59620-2951, USA.
J Rural Health. 2008 Spring;24(2):189-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2008.00157.x.
To assess stroke knowledge and practice among frontier and urban emergency medical services (EMS) providers and to evaluate the need for additional prehospital stroke training opportunities in Montana.
In 2006, a telephone survey of a representative sample of EMS providers was conducted in Montana. Respondents were stratified into 2 groups: those working in urban and frontier counties.
Compared to EMS providers from urban counties, those from frontier counties were significantly more likely to be older (mean age 44.7 vs 40.1 years), have fewer personnel working in their service (mean 17.7 vs 28.6), to be located farther away from a computed tomography scan (CT scan) (mean 41.3 vs 17.6 miles), and to be volunteers (84% vs 49%). They were also less likely to have a stroke protocol (58% vs 66%) and use a stroke screening tool (36% vs 47%) than their urban counterparts. There were no significant differences between frontier and urban EMS respondents' ability to correctly identify 4 or more stroke warning signs (58% vs 61%), 4 or more stroke risk factors (46% vs 43%), or the 3-hour recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) treatment window (56% vs 57%). Approximately two thirds of respondents from urban and frontier counties believed they had adequate stroke knowledge, but 90% indicated they were interested in additional stroke-related training.
Although stroke knowledge did not differ between urban and frontier groups, stroke screens and stroke protocols were less likely to be used in the frontier areas. Training opportunities and the implementation of stroke protocols and screening tools are needed for EMS providers, particularly in frontier counties.
评估蒙大拿州边境地区和城市紧急医疗服务(EMS)提供者的中风知识与实践情况,并评估该州对额外的院前中风培训机会的需求。
2006年,对蒙大拿州具有代表性的EMS提供者样本进行了电话调查。受访者被分为两组:在城市县和边境县工作的人员。
与城市县的EMS提供者相比,边境县的提供者年龄显著更大(平均年龄44.7岁对40.1岁),服务部门的工作人员更少(平均17.7人对28.6人),距离计算机断层扫描(CT扫描)地点更远(平均41.3英里对17.6英里),且志愿者比例更高(84%对49%)。与城市同行相比,他们制定中风治疗方案(58%对66%)和使用中风筛查工具(36%对47%)的可能性也更小。边境和城市EMS受访者正确识别4种或更多中风警示信号(58%对61%)、4种或更多中风风险因素(46%对43%)或3小时重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(rt-PA)治疗窗(56%对57%)的能力没有显著差异。城市和边境县约三分之二的受访者认为他们有足够的中风知识,但90%的受访者表示他们对额外的中风相关培训感兴趣。
尽管城市和边境地区的中风知识没有差异,但边境地区使用中风筛查和中风治疗方案的可能性较小。EMS提供者,尤其是边境县的提供者,需要培训机会以及中风治疗方案和筛查工具的实施。