Ponce de Leon Dario, Acevedo-Vasquez Eduardo, Alvizuri Sergio, Gutierrez Cesar, Cucho Mariano, Alfaro Jose, Perich Risto, Sanchez-Torres Alfredo, Pastor Cesar, Sanchez-Schwartz Cesar, Medina Mariela, Gamboa Rocio, Ugarte Manuel
Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Nacional Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen, Lima, Peru.
J Rheumatol. 2008 May;35(5):776-81. Epub 2008 Apr 1.
Tuberculosis (TB) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) undergoing treatment with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents is commonly the result of reactivation of latent TB infection (LTBI); detection and treatment of LTBI is essential before treatment with anti-TNF agents. We reported previously that the tuberculin skin test (TST) is inaccurate for diagnosis of LTBI in patients with RA. Here, we compare the prevalence of LTBI in RA patients and matched controls according to positive TST and QuantiFeron-TB Gold In-Tube version (QFT) results and determine their agreement.
A cross-sectional study of 101 RA patients and 93 controls was conducted in Lima, Perú, where the prevalence of LTBI in the general population has been estimated to be 68%. Blood was drawn for QFT assay followed by TST using 2-TU of RT 23 purified protein derivative. TST was deemed positive at >or= 5 mm for RA patients and >or= 10 mm for controls.
There were no significant differences between RA patients and controls for age, sex, bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccination, or history of or contact with TB. 88% of patients had active RA disease and 2 (1.9%) patients had indeterminate QFT results. The number of subjects testing positive with the QuantiFeron assay was comparable between patients and controls (44.6% vs 59.1%, respectively), whereas the TST detected significantly less LTBI among RA patients (26.7%) than controls (65.6%). Thus, the rate of LTBI in RA patients represented 75% and 41% of the rate in their controls using QFT or TST, respectively (p = 0.008). Poor agreement between TST and QFT was seen in RA patients, but in controls, good agreement was observed between these tests.
In a TB-endemic population, the QuantiFeron-TB Gold In-Tube assay seemed to be a more accurate test for detection of LTBI in RA patients compared with the TST, and may potentially improve the targeting of prophylactic therapy before treatment with anti-TNF agents.
类风湿关节炎(RA)患者在接受抗肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)药物治疗时发生的结核病(TB)通常是潜伏性结核感染(LTBI)重新激活的结果;在使用抗TNF药物治疗之前,检测和治疗LTBI至关重要。我们之前报道过结核菌素皮肤试验(TST)在诊断RA患者的LTBI时不准确。在此,我们根据TST阳性和全血γ干扰素释放试验(QFT)结果比较RA患者和匹配对照中LTBI的患病率,并确定它们之间的一致性。
在秘鲁利马对101例RA患者和93例对照进行了一项横断面研究,据估计该地区普通人群中LTBI的患病率为68%。采集血液进行QFT检测,随后使用2 TU的RT 23纯化蛋白衍生物进行TST。对于RA患者,TST≥5 mm被视为阳性;对于对照,TST≥10 mm被视为阳性。
RA患者和对照在年龄、性别、卡介苗接种情况或结核病史及接触史方面无显著差异。88%的患者患有活动性RA疾病,2例(1.9%)患者的QFT结果不确定。患者和对照中通过QFT检测呈阳性的受试者数量相当(分别为44.6%和59.1%),而TST检测到的RA患者中LTBI的比例(26.7%)明显低于对照(65.6%)。因此,使用QFT或TST时,RA患者中LTBI的发生率分别为对照的75%和41%(p = 0.008)。在RA患者中,TST和QFT之间的一致性较差,但在对照中,这些检测之间观察到良好的一致性。
在结核病流行地区,与TST相比,全血γ干扰素释放试验似乎是检测RA患者LTBI的更准确方法,并且可能潜在地改善在使用抗TNF药物治疗之前预防性治疗的针对性。