• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估阿尔瓦拉多评分作为疑似急性阑尾炎患者入院标准的价值。

Evaluation of Alvarado score as an admission criterion in patients with suspected diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

作者信息

Tade A O

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Olabisi Onabanjo University Teaching Hospital, Sagamu, Ogun State, Nigeria.

出版信息

West Afr J Med. 2007 Jul-Sep;26(3):210-2. doi: 10.4314/wajm.v26i3.28311.

DOI:10.4314/wajm.v26i3.28311
PMID:18399336
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with right iliac fossa pain present a diagnostic challenge to emergency room doctors when equivocal signs are present.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate Alvarado score as an admission criterion in patients with suspected diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

METHODS

This was a prospective study of 100 consecutive patients who presented to the an emergency department with right iliac fossa pain and suspected diagnosis of acute appendicitis between January 2004 and December 2004. They were assessed usingAlvarado score. Main outcome measures in relation to these scores were, patient's admission, patient's discharge, and whether patient had appendicitis or not.

RESULTS

The range of scores was 1-10. Seventy-four patients were admitted while 26 were discharged. Thirty-four patients with confirmed diagnosis of acute appendicitis had scores ranging from 5-10. No patient with score less than 5 had appendicitis. The sensitivity and negative predictive value reached 100% at scores below five, while specificity and positive predictive value reached 100% at the score of 10.

CONCLUSION

The Alvarado score can be used as an objective criterion in selecting for admission patients with suspected diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Patients with scores of 4 and below do not require admission since they turn out not to have acute appendicitis.

摘要

背景

当出现不明确的体征时,右下腹疼痛的患者给急诊医生带来了诊断挑战。

目的

评估阿尔瓦拉多评分作为疑似急性阑尾炎诊断患者入院标准的价值。

方法

这是一项前瞻性研究,对2004年1月至2004年12月期间连续100例因右下腹疼痛并疑似急性阑尾炎而就诊于急诊科的患者进行研究。使用阿尔瓦拉多评分对他们进行评估。与这些评分相关的主要结局指标为患者入院情况、出院情况以及患者是否患有阑尾炎。

结果

评分范围为1至10分。74例患者入院,26例出院。确诊为急性阑尾炎的34例患者评分在5至10分之间。评分低于5分的患者均无阑尾炎。评分低于5分时,敏感性和阴性预测值达到100%,而评分达到10分时,特异性和阳性预测值达到100%。

结论

阿尔瓦拉多评分可作为疑似急性阑尾炎诊断患者入院选择的客观标准。评分4分及以下的患者无需入院,因为他们最终未患急性阑尾炎。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Alvarado score as an admission criterion in patients with suspected diagnosis of acute appendicitis.评估阿尔瓦拉多评分作为疑似急性阑尾炎患者入院标准的价值。
West Afr J Med. 2007 Jul-Sep;26(3):210-2. doi: 10.4314/wajm.v26i3.28311.
2
Alvarado score as an admission criterion in children with pain in right iliac fossa.阿尔瓦拉多评分作为右下腹疼痛儿童的入院标准。
Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2010 Sep-Dec;7(3):163-5. doi: 10.4103/0189-6725.70417.
3
Alvarado score: an admission criterion in patients with right iliac fossa pain.阿尔瓦拉多评分:右下腹疼痛患者的入院标准。
Surgeon. 2003 Feb;1(1):39-41. doi: 10.1016/s1479-666x(03)80007-0.
4
Comparison of RIPASA and Alvarado scores for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.RIPASA 评分与 Alvarado 评分对急性阑尾炎诊断的比较。
Singapore Med J. 2011 May;52(5):340-5.
5
Effect of the Alvarado score on the diagnostic accuracy of right iliac fossa pain in an emergency.阿尔瓦拉多评分对急诊右下腹疼痛诊断准确性的影响。
Trop Doct. 2011 Jan;41(1):11-4. doi: 10.1258/td.2010.090509. Epub 2010 Sep 29.
6
[Application of alvarado score in patients with suspected appendicitis].阿尔瓦拉多评分在疑似阑尾炎患者中的应用
Korean J Gastroenterol. 2008 Jul;52(1):27-31.
7
[Role of the Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis].阿尔瓦拉多评分在急性阑尾炎诊断中的作用
Pan Afr Med J. 2018 Jan 22;29:56. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2018.29.56.14011. eCollection 2018.
8
Value of early change of serum C reactive protein combined to modified Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.血清C反应蛋白早期变化联合改良阿尔瓦拉多评分在急性阑尾炎诊断中的价值
BMC Emerg Med. 2018 May 24;18(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12873-018-0166-5.
9
Evaluation of the Alvarado score in acute abdominal pain.阿尔瓦拉多评分在急性腹痛中的评估
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2014 Mar;20(2):86-90. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2014.69639.
10
The use of the clinical scoring system by Alvarado in the decision to perform computed tomography for acute appendicitis in the ED.阿尔瓦拉多临床评分系统在急诊科对急性阑尾炎患者是否进行计算机断层扫描决策中的应用。
Am J Emerg Med. 2007 Jun;25(5):489-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.08.020.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review and meta-regression for validation of the Alvarado score as a tool for predicting acute appendicitis.一项关于验证阿尔瓦拉多评分作为预测急性阑尾炎工具的系统评价和Meta回归分析。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Feb 7;85(2):111-121. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000238. eCollection 2023 Feb.
2
The RIPASA scoring system: A new Era in appendicitis diagnosis.RIPASA评分系统:阑尾炎诊断的新时代。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Jul 12;80:104174. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104174. eCollection 2022 Aug.
3
Added value of graded compression ultrasound to the Alvarado score in cases of right iliac fossa pain.
在右下腹疼痛病例中,分级加压超声对阿尔瓦拉多评分的附加值。
Afr J Emerg Med. 2016 Sep;6(3):138-143. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
4
Clinical Prediction Rules for Appendicitis in Adults: Which Is Best?成人阑尾炎的临床预测规则:哪一种最佳?
World J Surg. 2017 Jul;41(7):1769-1781. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-3926-6.
5
The Alvarado score for predicting acute appendicitis: a systematic review.阿尔瓦拉多评分预测急性阑尾炎:系统评价。
BMC Med. 2011 Dec 28;9:139. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-139.