Suppr超能文献

RIPASA评分系统:阑尾炎诊断的新时代。

The RIPASA scoring system: A new Era in appendicitis diagnosis.

作者信息

Mumtaz Hassan, Sree Gummadi Sai, Vakkalagadda Naga Praneeth, Anne Krishna Kishore, Jabeen Sidra, Mehmood Qasim, Mehdi Zainab, Sohail Hassan, Haseeb Abdullah, Zafar Yumna, Saghir Shaima, Hasan Mohammad

机构信息

Maroof International Hospital Islamabad, Public Health Scholar, Health Services Academy Islamabad, Pakistan.

Government General Hospital, Guntur Medical College, Guntur, India.

出版信息

Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Jul 12;80:104174. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104174. eCollection 2022 Aug.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Even though acute appendicitis is a common acute abdominal disease, it is nonetheless difficult to detect. In order to minimize the risk of complications and negative exploratory procedures, early and accurate diagnosis is critical.We aimed to compare the predictive accuracy of the RIPASA score in diagnosing acute appendicitis with the gold standard of histopathological proven appendicitis as the gold standard.

METHODOLOGY

A Prospective Cohort Study was conducted from December 2021 to May 2022 at KRL Hospital. A total of 171 patients who sought treatment for acute RIF pain or suspected appendicitis were included in the study. Patients' surgical proclivities were judged in part based on images and surgeon's expertise. SPSS version 26 was used to enter and analyze the data. This was done using a chi-square test and a Kendall's Tau (Kendall Rank Correlation Coefficient) to evaluate both groups of patients.

RESULTS

At diagnosis, the mean age was 37.93 10.36 years. Kendall's Tau and Chi Square were shown to be significant in contrast to Alvarado scoring. RIPASA Scoring exhibited a 98.02% positive predictive value, a 96.75% sensitivity, an 82.35% specificity, and 95.3% diagnostic accuracy.

CONCLUSION

The RIPASA score is superior to the Alvarado score when it comes to detecting acute appendicitis in Asian populations. With a brief medical history, a clinical examination, and two simple procedures, parameters can be simply and swiftly obtained in any demographic circumstance.

摘要

引言

尽管急性阑尾炎是一种常见的急腹症,但仍难以检测。为了将并发症风险和阴性探查手术的风险降至最低,早期准确诊断至关重要。我们旨在将RIPASA评分诊断急性阑尾炎的预测准确性与组织病理学证实的阑尾炎这一金标准进行比较。

方法

2021年12月至2022年5月在KRL医院进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。共有171名因急性右下腹疼痛或疑似阑尾炎而寻求治疗的患者纳入研究。部分根据图像和外科医生的专业知识判断患者的手术倾向。使用SPSS 26版输入和分析数据。通过卡方检验和肯德尔tau(肯德尔等级相关系数)对两组患者进行评估。

结果

诊断时,平均年龄为37.93±10.36岁。与阿尔瓦拉多评分相比,肯德尔tau和卡方显示出显著性。RIPASA评分的阳性预测值为98.02%,敏感性为96.75%,特异性为82.35%,诊断准确性为95.3%。

结论

在亚洲人群中检测急性阑尾炎时,RIPASA评分优于阿尔瓦拉多评分。凭借简短的病史、临床检查和两项简单的检查,在任何人群情况下都可以简单快速地获得参数。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d3b/9422193/81fa2c99f565/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验