Räikkönen Katri, Matthews Karen A
University of Helsinki, Finland.
J Pers. 2008 Jun;76(3):605-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00498.x. Epub 2008 Apr 8.
We tested the hypotheses that (1) high pessimism and low optimism (LOT-R overall and subscale scores) would predict high ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) level and 24-hour load (percentage of ABP values exceeding the pediatric 95th percentile) among healthy Black and White adolescents (n=201; 14-16 yrs) across 2 consecutive school days and (2) that the relationships for the pessimism and optimism subscales would show nonlinear effects. The hypotheses were confirmed for pessimism but not for optimism. The results suggest that high pessimism may have different effects than low optimism on ABP and that even moderate levels of pessimism may effect blood pressure regulation. These results suggest that optimism and pessimism are not the opposite poles on a single continuum but ought to be treated as separate constructs.
(1)在连续两个上学日中,高度悲观和低度乐观(LOT - R总分及各分量表得分)会预测健康的黑人和白人青少年(n = 201;14 - 16岁)的动态血压(ABP)水平和24小时负荷(ABP值超过儿童第95百分位数的百分比);(2)悲观和乐观分量表之间的关系将呈现非线性效应。关于悲观的假设得到了证实,但关于乐观的假设未得到证实。结果表明,高度悲观对ABP的影响可能与低度乐观不同,甚至适度的悲观水平也可能影响血压调节。这些结果表明,乐观和悲观并非单一连续体上的相反两极,而应被视为独立的概念。