Zappa U, Studer M, Merkle A, Graf H, Simona C
Zahnmedizinische Kliniken, Bern.
Parodontol. 1991 Nov;2(4):299-308.
Electrically powered devices represent a hazard for patients with cardiac pacemakers. The aim of the present investigation was an in vivo evaluation of possible interactions between electrically powered dental instruments and the function of artificial pacemakers in humans. In 26 patients with artificial pacemakers, different dental instruments were applied, including air scaler, ultrasonic curets, electric pulp tester and electrotome. These devices were applied at highest intensity. Immediately prior to, during, and immediately after applications of these instruments, the pulse rate and the electrocardiogram (EKG) were recorded. The EKG recordings were assessed for irregularities in the distances between the pacemaker peaks. The dental devices were assessed for magnetic fields or induction tension. The results showed that none of the dental devices caused an irregularity in the pacemaker function. The air scaler, Piezon ultrasonic curet and the electric pulp tester caused no measurable magnetic fields. The Sonus 2 ultrasonic curet and the electrotome magnetic fields were measured up to 60 and 50 cm, respectively. All dental devices caused induction tension. The highest value was produced by the electrotome. It seems that cardiac pacemaker function is not affected by electrically powered dental devices. However, there remains a risk in relation to older pacemakers or defective dental devices.
电动设备对植入心脏起搏器的患者构成危险。本研究的目的是对电动牙科器械与人体人工起搏器功能之间可能存在的相互作用进行体内评估。对26名植入人工起搏器的患者使用了不同的牙科器械,包括气动洁牙机、超声波刮治器、牙髓电活力测试仪和电刀。这些器械均以最高强度使用。在使用这些器械之前、使用期间以及使用之后,立即记录脉搏率和心电图(EKG)。评估心电图记录中起搏器波峰之间距离的不规则情况。检测牙科器械的磁场或感应电压。结果显示,没有一种牙科器械导致起搏器功能出现异常。气动洁牙机、压电式超声波刮治器和牙髓电活力测试仪未产生可测量的磁场。Sonus 2超声波刮治器和电刀的磁场分别在距离器械60厘米和50厘米处被检测到。所有牙科器械均产生了感应电压。电刀产生的感应电压值最高。看来心脏起搏器的功能不受电动牙科器械的影响。然而,对于较旧的起搏器或有缺陷的牙科器械,仍存在风险。