Gelb Arthur F, Karpel Jill, Wise Robert A, Cassino Cara, Johnson Philip, Conoscenti Craig S
Pulmonary Division, Lakewood Regional Medical Center, Lakewood, CA, USA.
Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Aug;21(4):630-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2008.02.005. Epub 2008 Mar 5.
The potential of anticholinergics to provide bronchodilatory benefits over short-acting beta(2)-agonists (SABA) alone in patients with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma has not been well defined.
An outpatient, randomized, double-blind, single-dose, crossover study in adult asthmatics with moderate-to-severe obstruction despite treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) was conducted comparing the fixed combination of ipratropium and albuterol (IB+ALB) to albuterol alone (ALB). Serial spirometry was performed over 6h. SABA were withheld for 8h, ICS and LABA for 24h.
A total of 113 patients were randomized, 106 completed the study (males n=47; mean+/-SD age=51+/-13 years). Mean+/-SD baseline FEV(1)=1.4+/-0.5 L (49+/-12% predicted). IB+ALB resulted in significantly greater improvements over ALB in the average improvement over baseline in FEV(1) as approximated from the area under the curve from 0 to 6h after drug administration (72 ml, p<0.01) and mean peak FEV(1) response (55 ml, p<0.01) as well as higher FEV(1) responses at individual time points from 0.5 to 6h postdose (p<0.01 for all). Time to onset of response was similar between groups but time to peak and duration of response were longer with IB+ALB versus ALB (120 versus 60 min and 245 versus 106 min, respectively).
IB+ALB resulted in significantly greater improvement in FEV(1) and longer duration of response compared to ALB alone in patients with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma (Trial number: 1012.50; ClinicalTrial.gov NCT00096616).
在中度至重度持续性哮喘患者中,抗胆碱能药物相较于单独使用短效β2激动剂(SABA)提供支气管扩张益处的潜力尚未明确界定。
对尽管接受吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)治疗仍有中度至重度气道阻塞的成年哮喘患者进行了一项门诊随机双盲单剂量交叉研究,比较异丙托溴铵和沙丁胺醇固定组合(IB+ALB)与单独使用沙丁胺醇(ALB)的效果。在6小时内进行系列肺功能测定。SABA停用8小时,ICS和长效β2激动剂(LABA)停用24小时。
共113例患者随机分组,106例完成研究(男性47例;平均±标准差年龄=51±13岁)。平均±标准差基线第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)=1.4±0.5升(预计值的49±12%)。从给药后0至6小时曲线下面积估算,IB+ALB在FEV1相对于基线的平均改善方面显著优于ALB(72毫升,p<0.01),平均FEV1峰值反应方面也显著优于ALB(55毫升,p<0.01),且在给药后0.5至6小时各时间点的FEV1反应也更高(所有时间点p<0.01)。两组的起效时间相似,但IB+ALB相对于ALB的达峰时间和反应持续时间更长(分别为120分钟对60分钟和245分钟对106分钟)。
在中度至重度持续性哮喘患者中,与单独使用ALB相比,IB+ALB使FEV1有显著更大改善且反应持续时间更长(试验编号:1012.50;ClinicalTrial.gov标识符:NCT00096616)。