Schmutz Beat, Wullschleger Martin E, Kim Henry, Noser Hansrudi, Schütz Michael A
Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
J Orthop Trauma. 2008 Apr;22(4):258-63. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31816b10ba.
With the development and popularization of minimally invasive surgical methods and implants for fracture fixation, it is increasingly important that the available implants are precontoured to the specific anatomic location for which they are designed. The objective of this study was to develop a noninvasive method and criteria for quantifying the fit of a distal periarticular medial tibia plate and to test the method on a small set of tibia models.
The undersurface of the plate was extracted from a digital model of the plate. The surface of the plate was fitted to 21 computer tomography (CT)-based 3-dimensional (3-D) models of human tibiae. Four criteria were defined that constitute an anatomic plate fit and subsequently were applied for the quantitative fit assessment. The fitting of the plate undersurface to the bone was entirely conducted in a virtual environment.
An anatomic fit of the plate was achieved for 4 of the models (19%). The individual categories generated fits of 62% (n = 13) for the proximal end; 43% (n = 9) for the proximal angle; 57% (n = 12) for the middle distance; and 57% (n = 12) for a distal fit.
Although for the 4 individual criteria plate fits of 43%-62% were achieved, a global/anatomic fit only occurred for 19% of the bone models. This outcome is likely a result of bone morphology variations, which exist in a random population sample combined with the effects of a nonoptimized plate shape. Recommendations for optimizing the fit of the plate are discussed.
随着骨折内固定微创手术方法及植入物的发展与普及,使现有植入物预先塑形以适应其设计的特定解剖部位变得愈发重要。本研究的目的是开发一种无创方法和标准,用于量化胫骨远端关节周围内侧钢板的适配性,并在一小批胫骨模型上对该方法进行测试。
从钢板的数字模型中提取钢板的底面。将钢板表面与基于21例计算机断层扫描(CT)的人体胫骨三维(3-D)模型进行拟合。定义了四个构成解剖学钢板适配的标准,并随后将其应用于定量适配评估。钢板底面与骨骼的拟合完全在虚拟环境中进行。
4个模型(19%)实现了钢板的解剖学适配。各个类别在近端的适配率为62%(n = 13);近端角度为43%(n = 9);中间距离为57%(n = 12);远端适配为57%(n = 12)。
尽管对于4个单独标准,钢板适配率达到了43%-62%,但仅19%的骨骼模型实现了整体/解剖学适配。这一结果可能是由于在随机人群样本中存在的骨骼形态变异以及非优化钢板形状的影响所致。讨论了优化钢板适配性的建议。