• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤后癫痫发作预后的预测因素。

Factors predictive of outcome in posttraumatic seizures.

作者信息

Wang Hung-Chen, Chang Wen-Neng, Chang Hsueh-Wen, Ho Jih-Tsun, Yang Tzu-Ming, Lin Wei-Che, Chuang Yao-Chung, Lu Cheng-Hsien

机构信息

Departments of Neurosurgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical Center, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, China.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2008 Apr;64(4):883-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31804a7fa4.

DOI:10.1097/TA.0b013e31804a7fa4
PMID:18404052
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Seizures are important neurologic complications of traumatic brain injury (TBI). There is a need for better delineation of potential prognostic factors and outcomes in patients with posttraumatic seizures (PTS) who could receive treatment when brought to the hospital.

METHODS

In this 10-year retrospective study, 170 adult patients with PTS were enrolled in this study. The degree of seizure control was analyzed using a Seizure Frequency Scoring System, which classified them into excellent and nonexcellent outcomes.

RESULTS

There were 170 patients with acute symptomatic seizure enrolled in this study, 106 of whom had early PTS, whereas 64 had late PTS. Of the 106 early PTS, 58% (61 of 106) occurred within 24 hours of trauma. Risk factors for developing nonexcellent outcome included patients who undergo surgical intervention and presence of late-provoked seizures during the acute phase of TBI.

CONCLUSIONS

Seizures are an important neurologic complication of TBI. Regarding the potentially side effects of antiepileptic drugs, antiepileptic therapy should be carefully administrated in those nonexcellent outcome patients.

摘要

背景

癫痫发作是创伤性脑损伤(TBI)重要的神经并发症。对于创伤后癫痫(PTS)患者,在其被送至医院时,需要更好地明确潜在的预后因素及结果,以便进行治疗。

方法

在这项为期10年的回顾性研究中,170例成年PTS患者被纳入研究。使用癫痫发作频率评分系统分析癫痫控制程度,将其分为良好和非良好结局。

结果

本研究纳入170例急性症状性癫痫患者,其中106例为早期PTS,64例为晚期PTS。在106例早期PTS中,58%(106例中的61例)在创伤后24小时内发作。非良好结局的危险因素包括接受手术干预的患者以及TBI急性期出现晚期诱发癫痫。

结论

癫痫发作是TBI的重要神经并发症。鉴于抗癫痫药物可能存在的副作用,对于非良好结局的患者应谨慎给予抗癫痫治疗。

相似文献

1
Factors predictive of outcome in posttraumatic seizures.创伤后癫痫发作预后的预测因素。
J Trauma. 2008 Apr;64(4):883-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31804a7fa4.
2
Posttraumatic cerebral infarction: incidence, outcome, and risk factors.创伤后脑梗死:发病率、转归及危险因素
J Trauma. 2008 Apr;64(4):849-53. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318160c08a.
3
Post-traumatic seizures-A prospective study from a tertiary level trauma center in a developing country.创伤后癫痫发作-发展中国家三级创伤中心的前瞻性研究。
Seizure. 2010 May;19(4):211-6. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2010.02.004. Epub 2010 Mar 3.
4
Epidemiology of traumatic brain injury in eastern China, 2004: a prospective large case study.2004年中国东部创伤性脑损伤的流行病学:一项前瞻性大型病例研究。
J Trauma. 2008 May;64(5):1313-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318165c803.
5
Risk factors for late-onset seizures related to cerebral contusions in adults with a moderate traumatic brain injury.中度创伤性脑损伤成年患者中与脑挫裂伤相关的迟发性癫痫的危险因素。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2011 Jul;113(6):469-71. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2011.02.004. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
6
Predictors of postacute mortality following traumatic brain injury in a seriously injured population.严重受伤人群创伤性脑损伤后急性后期死亡率的预测因素。
J Trauma. 2008 Apr;64(4):876-82. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31804d493e.
7
Preventing and treating posttraumatic seizures: the human experience.预防和治疗创伤后癫痫:人类的经验
Epilepsia. 2009 Feb;50 Suppl 2:10-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.02005.x.
8
Management of head injury. Posttraumatic seizures.
Neurosurg Clin N Am. 1991 Apr;2(2):425-35.
9
Clinical epidemiology of posttraumatic epilepsy in a group of Chinese patients.中国患者创伤后癫痫的临床流行病学。
Seizure. 2012 Jun;21(5):322-6. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2012.02.007. Epub 2012 Mar 16.
10
Headache after moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal analysis.中重度创伤性脑损伤后的头痛:一项纵向分析
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Sep;86(9):1793-800. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.12.042.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive value of peripheral blood inflammatory markers for epilepsy occurrence in traumatic brain injury patients.外周血炎症标志物对创伤性脑损伤患者癫痫发生的预测价值
Acta Epileptol. 2025 Jun 26;7(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s42494-025-00226-2.
2
Sudden death from an epileptic seizure due to capillary telangiectasias in the hippocampus.因海马体毛细血管扩张症导致癫痫发作而猝死。
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2019 Jun;15(2):243-248. doi: 10.1007/s12024-018-0075-7. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
3
Risk of post-traumatic epilepsy after severe head injury in patients with at least one seizure.
至少有一次癫痫发作的严重颅脑损伤患者创伤后癫痫的风险
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2017 Aug 30;13:2301-2306. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S141486. eCollection 2017.
4
Predictors and long-term outcome of seizures in human immuno-deficiency virus (HIV)-negative cryptococcal meningitis.人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)阴性隐球菌性脑膜炎患者癫痫发作的预测因素及长期预后
BMC Neurol. 2014 Oct 13;14:208. doi: 10.1186/s12883-014-0208-x.
5
Post-traumatic epilepsy: current and emerging treatment options.创伤后癫痫:当前和新兴的治疗选择。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014 Aug 11;10:1469-77. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S50421. eCollection 2014.
6
Seizures after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.自发性脑出血后的癫痫发作。
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2012 Oct;52(4):312-9. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2012.52.4.312. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
7
Management of traumatic brain injury.颅脑创伤的处理。
Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2010 Mar;12(2):142-54. doi: 10.1007/s11940-010-0063-z.
8
Post-traumatic seizures exacerbate histopathological damage after fluid-percussion brain injury.创伤后癫痫会加剧液压脑损伤后的组织病理学损伤。
J Neurotrauma. 2011 Jan;28(1):35-42. doi: 10.1089/neu.2010.1383. Epub 2010 Oct 12.
9
Blood-brain barrier breakdown as a therapeutic target in traumatic brain injury.血脑屏障破坏作为创伤性脑损伤的治疗靶点。
Nat Rev Neurol. 2010 Jul;6(7):393-403. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2010.74. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
10
Intranasal delivery of antiepileptic medications for treatment of seizures.用于治疗癫痫发作的抗癫痫药物的鼻内给药。
Neurotherapeutics. 2009 Apr;6(2):352-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nurt.2009.01.002.