Department of Drug Research and Evaluation, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena, Rome, 299 00161, Italy,
Purinergic Signal. 2006 Nov;2(4):619-25. doi: 10.1007/s11302-006-9026-y. Epub 2006 Sep 28.
The aim of the present paper was to examine, in a comparative way, the occurrence and the mechanisms of the interactions between adenosine A(2A) receptors (A(2A)Rs) and metabotropic glutamate 5 receptors (mGlu5Rs) in the hippocampus and the striatum. In rat hippocampal and corticostriatal slices, combined ineffective doses of the mGlu5R agonist 2-chloro-5-hydroxyphenylglycine (CHPG) and the A(2A)R agonist CGS 21680 synergistically reduced the slope of excitatory postsynaptic field potentials (fEPSPs) recorded in CA1 and the amplitude of field potentials (FPs) recorded in the dorsomedial striatum. The cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)/protein kinase A (PKA) pathway appeared to be involved in the effects of CGS 21680 in corticostriatal but not in hippocampal slices. In both areas, a postsynaptic locus of interaction appeared more likely. N-methyl-D: -aspartate (NMDA) reduced the fEPSP slope and FP amplitude in hippocampal and corticostriatal slices, respectively. Such an effect was significantly potentiated by CHPG in both areas. Interestingly, the A(2A)R antagonist ZM 241385 significantly reduced the NMDA-potentiating effect of CHPG. In primary cultures of rat hippocampal and striatal neurons (ED 17, DIV 14), CHPG significantly potentiated NMDA-induced lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release. Again, such an effect was prevented by ZM 241385. Our results show that A(2A) and mGlu5 receptors functionally interact both in the hippocampus and in the striatum, even though different mechanisms seem to be involved in the two areas. The ability of A(2A)Rs to control mGlu5R-dependent effects may thus be a general feature of A(2A)Rs in different brain regions (irrespective of their density) and may represent an additional target for the development of therapeutic strategies against neurological disorders.
本文旨在以比较的方式研究在海马体和纹状体中,腺苷 A(2A) 受体 (A(2A)R) 和代谢型谷氨酸 5 受体 (mGlu5R) 之间相互作用的发生和机制。在大鼠海马和皮质纹状体切片中,联合使用代谢型谷氨酸 5 受体激动剂 2-氯-5-羟苯甘氨酸 (CHPG) 和腺苷 A(2A) 受体激动剂 CGS 21680 的无效剂量协同降低了在 CA1 记录的兴奋性突触后场电位 (fEPSP) 的斜率和在背侧纹状体记录的场电位 (FP) 的幅度。环磷酸腺苷 (cAMP)/蛋白激酶 A (PKA) 途径似乎参与了 CGS 21680 在皮质纹状体中的作用,但不参与海马切片中的作用。在这两个区域,相互作用的位置似乎更倾向于突触后。N-甲基-D: -天冬氨酸 (NMDA) 分别降低了海马和皮质纹状体切片中的 fEPSP 斜率和 FP 幅度。这种作用在两个区域均被 CHPG 显著增强。有趣的是,腺苷 A(2A) 受体拮抗剂 ZM 241385 显著降低了 CHPG 对 NMDA 的增强作用。在大鼠海马和纹状体神经元(ED 17,DIV 14)的原代培养物中,CHPG 显著增强了 NMDA 诱导的乳酸脱氢酶 (LDH) 释放。同样,这种作用被 ZM 241385 所阻止。我们的结果表明,A(2A) 和 mGlu5 受体在海马体和纹状体中具有功能性相互作用,尽管在这两个区域中似乎涉及不同的机制。A(2A)R 控制 mGlu5R 依赖性效应的能力可能是 A(2A)R 在不同脑区(无论其密度如何)的一个普遍特征,并且可能是针对神经退行性疾病开发治疗策略的另一个靶点。